416
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

First-trimester screening for early preeclampsia risk using maternal characteristics and estimated placental volume

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1155-1160 | Received 07 Jan 2019, Accepted 02 Jun 2019, Published online: 20 Jun 2019
 

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the strategy of screening for preeclampsia (PE) in the first trimester based on maternal characteristics, and estimated placental volume (EPV).

Methods

A prospective cohort study was performed with 351 women enrolled, of which 13 women developed PE. This study analyzed the risk of PE according to ultrasonography findings of the placenta, maternal characteristics, and serum markers. The placental ultrasound exam and maternal serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) was determined at 11+0 to 13+6 weeks and the serum alpha-fetoprotein (MSAFP), human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), unconjugated estriol (uE3), and inhibin A were assayed at 14+0 to 22+0 weeks. We reviewed all antenatal medical screening records and assessed the relationships of EPV of ultrasound examination, maternal characteristics, and serum markers by using multiple logistic regression analysis.

Results

Thirteen of the 351 women (3.7%) developed PE in singleton pregnancy. The gestational age at delivery was significantly different between the normal and PE group (p < .001). In the PE group, the placental weight at delivery was not statistically different between the normal and the PE group. The EPV at the first trimester was significantly lower in women with PE compared to those without PE (p = .002). In addition, we predicted PE using combined maternal age, BMI, and EPV, which were achieving an area under the curve of 0.83 overall.

Conclusion

A risk prediction model of PE, which combined maternal age, BMI, and EPV can be adopted for the screening of PE at the first trimester in singleton pregnancy.

Acknowledgements

This paper was supported by Bumsuk Academic Research Fund in 2016.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.