407
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Pregestational body mass index, trimester-specific weight gain and total gestational weight gain: how do they influence perinatal outcomes?

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1207-1214 | Received 20 Dec 2018, Accepted 04 Jun 2019, Published online: 15 Jul 2019
 

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the association between pre-gestational body mass index (BMI), total gestational weight gain (GWG), and/or trimester-specific weight gain (GWGT) with adverse maternal or perinatal outcomes (AMPOs).

Materials and methods

Maternal clinical characteristics and pregnancy and perinatal outcomes were used to predict AMPOs. The predictive ability of BMI, GWG, or GWGT for AMPOs was analyzed using the area under the curve (AUC). Logistic regression models in a univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to predict maternal outcomes (pregnancy-induced hypertension, preeclampsia or gestational diabetes mellitus) and perinatal outcomes (small for gestational age, large for gestational age, 5-min Apgar score, admission to neonatal intensive care unit or umbilical cord pH <7.15).

Results

Women with AMPOs (n = 293) were younger with higher rate of nulliparity (p < .001) and with lower height (p = .018) as compared to controls (n = 134). In the univariate study, GWGT in third trimester was associated with double risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension (OR 2.00; 95% CI, 1.01–3.97). Nonetheless, third-trimester GWG and total GWG have a negative relationship with gestational diabetes mellitus OR 0.32 (95% CI, 0.18–0.58) and OR 0.35 (95% CI, 0.21–0.59), respectively. Women with greater overall and in second trimester, GWG have a lower risk of having SGA neonates, OR 0.62 (95% CI, 0.39–0.98) and OR 0.60 (95% CI, 0.37–0.98), respectively. In the multivariate study, pre-gestational BMI is strongly related to the development of preeclampsia and the area under the curve (AUC) of the combination of pre-gestational BMI and total weight gain was 0.832 (95% CI, 0.63–0.81) for preeclampsia and 0.719 (95% CI, 0.71–0.94) for gestational diabetes mellitus.

Conclusion

Our results suggest than timing of gestational weight gain influence in maternal and perinatal outcomes. Pre-gestational BMI is a determinant of preeclampsia, maternal weight gain in the third trimester is a determinant of pregnancy-induced hypertension and the increase in total GWG reduces the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus and small for gestational age.

Conclusion

Pre-gestational BMI is clearly associated with the development of PE, increasing the risk to double. The increase in total GWG reduces the risk of GDM and SGA and the increase in weight in the third trimester is associated with the development of PIH. Because of that, it is important to underscore the importance of high quality preconception care to ensure that a woman is in optimal health prior to becoming pregnant and control gestational weight gain particularly in third trimester. In this sense, we recommend of going for an antenatal visit in order to check the BMI for women previous to pregnancy.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.