Non-invasive high flow oscillatory ventilation in comparison with nasal continuous positive pressure ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome, a literature review

Abstract

Background

Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) keeps the lung open with add-on effective rhythmic oscillations in addition to allowing spontaneous breathing. This review aims at reconstructing the different pieces of available research articles and evidence into a more solid collective evidence for NHFOV in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).

Methods

A thorough systemic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and Cochrane. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on preterm infants with RDS comparing NHFOV with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in terms of PCO₂ change, need for ventilation, duration of respiratory support, mortality air leak, or BPD were included. Data quality assessment and meta-analyses were carried out.

Results

Five RCTs involving 270 preterm infants included in the review. PCO₂ relatively decreased on NHFOV (MD = 3.84, confidence interval (CI) 7.32–0.35, p = .03). On the other hand, relative risk (RR) of intubation was unquestionably decreased with NHFOV in comparison with NCPAP (RR  =  0.43, CI 0.25–0.75, p = .003) without statistical heterogeneity I² = 0%. Although the risk of mortality was less in NHFOV, the difference was statistically insignificant (RR = 0.72, CI 0.24–2.18, p = .56). Other outcomes reported in single studies only. Duration of respiratory support was significantly shorter in NHFOV compared with NCPAP (37.35 ± 8.96 versus 49.77 ± 10.33, p = .009), whereas air leak and BPD were reported in very few cases without a significant difference between the two interventions.

Conclusions

NHFOV improved the PCO₂ elimination and decreased the risk of intubation without a significant change in mortality compared with NCPAP.

Keywords:

• Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP)
• neonate
• noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV)
• respiratory distress syndrome (RDS)

Acknowledgments

As a Southampton University School of Health Sciences student on the MSc Neonatology, I appreciate the help and support I received from Susan Smith, Dr. Michael Hall and the Neonatal Online Training and Education (NOTE) team.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.