Abstract
The delimitation of cryptic species is necessary to accurately classify and appropriately conserve biodiversity. Integrative analyses can be incisive in detecting and circumscribing cryptic diversity, especially in species complexes whose members are delineated by minor or overlapping morphological variation. We adopt an integrative approach to assess species relationships and resolve species boundaries in the taxonomically difficult Nervilia adolphi/punctata species alliance of N. sect. Linervia, an Old World complex of reduced, one-flowered terrestrial orchids that is both species-rich and poorly known in tropical and warm temperate Asia. We sampled 12 of the 27 known species of the alliance in Asia, including all four species reported from Thailand and a further 20 plants collected in that country that could not be satisfactorily identified using morphology alone. Phylogenetic analyses using one nuclear (ITS) and two plastid (matK and trnL-F) markers confirmed both N. sect. Linervia and the alliance itself as monophyletic, and corroborated 11 of the 12 sampled species; N. punctata proved polyphyletic, with the Thai samples referred to this Indonesian species falling sister to the Himalayan N. mackinnonii. The 20 unidentified Thai samples formed three distinct, strongly supported clades. STACEY, a Bayesian coalescence approach to species delimitation, resolved the same three clusters, but provided evidence suggesting that one comprised two distinct sub-clades. Building on this genetic evidence, we identify subtle morphological differences and invoke a diagnosable species concept to circumscribe three previously unrecognized cryptic species from Thailand. This objective approach to species delimitation validates ostensibly minor morphological differences as a basis for differentiating species within the alliance, paving the way for a global analysis of species boundaries throughout the genus as a whole.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Wins Buddhawong and Sermpong Nualngam for assistance in the field, and to Orathai Kerdkaew for preparing the line drawings. The director and staff at the herbaria listed in the Materials and Methods are thanked for granting us permission to study specimens in their collections. The feedback received from two anonymous reviewers was helpful for improving an earlier version of this paper.
Disclosure statement
None of the authors have received or will receive any benefit, financial or otherwise, arising from the direct application of this research.
Supplemental data
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here: https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2017.1415233.