Incorrect legends were provided for the following figures.
Figure 4 Noteridae species, Prosternum, mestoventrite and metacoxae. A—Suphis cimicoides. B—Notomicrus sp. C—Neohydrocoptus bivittus. D—Pronoterus sp. E—Mesonoterus crassicornis. F—Suphisellus sp. G—Hydrocanthus iricolor. Scale bars = 0.25 mm.
It should read: Figure 4 Noteridae species, Prosternum, mesoventrite and metacoxae. A—Notomicrus sp. B—Neohydrocoptus bivittus. C—Pronoterus sp. D—Mesonoterus crassicornis. E—Suphisellus sp. F—Hydrocanthus iricolor. G—Suphis cimicoides. Scale bars = 0.25 mm.
Figure 12 Female genitalia, ventral aspect, Pronoterus sp. Scale bar = 0.25 mm.
It should read: Figure 12 Female genitalia, ventral aspect, Siolius sp. Scale bar = 0.25 mm.
Figure 13 Female genitalia, ventral aspect, Mesonoterus crassicornis. Scale bar = 0.25 mm.
It should read: Figure 13 Female genitalia, ventral aspect, Pronoterus sp. Scale bar = 0.25 mm.
Figure 14 Female genitalia, ventral aspect, Noterus clavicornis. Scale bar = 0.25 mm.
It should read: Figure 14 Female genitalia, ventral aspect, Mesonoterus crassicornis. Scale bar = 0.25 mm.
Figure 15 Female genitalia, ventral aspect, Siolius sp. Scale bar = 0.25 mm.
It should read: Figure 15 Female genitalia, ventral aspect, Noterus clavicornis. Scale bar = 0.25 mm.
Reference
- Miller , K. B. 2009 . On the systematics of Noteridae (Coleoptra: Adephaga: Hydradephaga): Phylogeny, description of a new tribe, genus and species, and survey of female genital morphology . Systematics and Biodiversity , 7 : 191 – 214 .