Abstract
Recent discoveries from the Late Triassic and Middle Jurassic have significantly improved the fossil record of early turtles. These new forms offer a unique opportunity to test the interrelationships of basal turtles. Nineteen fossil species are added to the taxon sample of the most comprehensive morphological phylogenetic analysis of the turtle clade. Among these additional species are recently discovered forms (e.g. Odontochelys semitestacea, Eileanchelys waldmani, Condorchelys antiqua), taxa generally omitted from previous analyses (e.g. chengyuchelyids, Sichuanchelys chowi) and species included in a phylogenetic analysis for the first time (Naomichelys speciosa and Siamochelys peninsularis). The coding of several characters is reassessed in the light of recent observations, but also in order to reduce unwarranted assumptions on character and character state homologies. Additional characters from previous analyses, as well as five new ones, are also included, resulting in a data matrix of 178 characters scored for 86 turtle species and seven fossil outgroups. The dataset resolves the relationships of most newly included taxa, with the exception of S. chowi and ‘Chengyuchelys’ dashanpuensis. The phylogenetic placement of Heckerochelys romani, Condorchelys antiqua and Eileanchelys waldmani as stem turtles more derived than Kayentachelys aprix but more basal than Meiolania platyceps and Mongolochelys efremovi is corroborated. The relationships of chengyuchelyids remain unclear and they are unstable with respect to stem turtles. In contrast to previous analyses, Arundelemys dardeni is placed within pleurosternids and Siamochelys peninsularis falls within xinjiangchelyids. Perhaps the most salient conclusion of the present study is the placement of Naomichelys speciosa as a basal member of a clade uniting meiolaniids, Mongolochelys efremovi and Otwayemys cunicularius. This clade of rather large stem turtles had a worldwide spread during the Mesozoic at least, and persisted until the Pleistocene with meiolaniids.
Acknowledgements
The following researchers and curators are thanked for enabling access to specimens in their care: C. Mehling and E. Gaffney (AMNH), B. Zipfel and B. Rubidge (BP), O. Rauhut and A. López-Arbarello (BSPG), W. Simpson and A. Resetar (FMNH), Z. Zhonghe and W. Yuan (IVPP), J. Müller (MB), C. Schaff (MCZ), J. Gillette (MNA), S. Chapman and A. Milner (NHM), J. O. Ebbestad and J. Peel (PMU), R. Schoch and A. Matzke (SMNS), T. Rowe (TMM), P. Holroyd (UCPM), W. Joyce (YPM), G. Peng and Y. Ye (ZDM). Walter Joyce and an anonymous reviewer provided detailed reviews of this work and their comments significantly helped to improve the quality of the paper. I am indebted to my supervisors, S. E. Evans and P. M. Barrett, for their insightful comments and advice throughout my thesis research. M. Wilkinson, S. Maidment and R. Butler provided valuable information regarding cladistic methodology. The present study also benefitted from discussions on turtle anatomy with W. Joyce and J. Sterli, and from the careful review of an earlier version of the manuscript by G. Billet. This work was funded by a NHM PhD studentship and a postdoctoral grant from the Simone and Cino del Duca Foundation (2008 Prize awarded to P. Janvier, MNHN).