Publication Cover
Astropolitics
The International Journal of Space Politics & Policy
Volume 15, 2017 - Issue 3
1,359
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Viewpoint

U.S.-China Space Cooperation: Balancing Act between the U.S. Congress and President

Pages 235-250 | Published online: 31 Oct 2017
 

ABSTRACT

There are a growing number of U.S. space scientists and managers calling for reinitiating cooperation with China in space. It is well-known that investigations of the U.S. Congress into various allegations involving China have resulted in a series of laws curtailing space cooperation between these two countries. By surveying the concurrent political developments within the United States in the 1980s and 1990s, this article attempts to reveal the domestic compulsions that propelled changes in the U.S. space policy towards China. The fundamental impetus is the power struggle and differences between the U.S. president and Congress in their perception of U.S. economic interests and national security in the context of space technology that strained these relations. Recent U.S. presidents who inherited this situation added to the discourse based on their own perceptions about outer space and China. These perceptions either found congruence with the policy of the U.S. Congress or led to finding ways to circumvent its legal restrictions. Based on these developments, it is concluded that the view of the U.S. president has alternated between necessary, desirable, and objectionable on the issue of U.S.-China space cooperation, and the U.S. Congress has thus shifted from supporting to restricting and then legally banning cooperation.

Notes

1. Andrew Jones, “NASA’s Bolden Quietly Visited China Last Month, Despite Restrictions on Cooperation,” GB Times, 23 September 2016, http://gbtimes.com/china/nasas-bolden-quietly-visited-china-last-month-despite-restrictions-cooperation (accessed 1 October 2016).

2. Buzz Aldrin, “Buzz Aldrin: Why the U.S. Should Partner with China in Space,” Time, 11 June 2015, http://time.com/3916379/buzz-aldrin-china-space-partnership/ (accessed 1 October 2016).

3. “U.S.-China Joint Statement,” The White House, 17 November 2009, https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/us-china-joint-statement (accessed 1 October 2016).

4. Chris Impey, Beyond: Our Future in Space (New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company, 2016).

5. Office of Science & Technology Cooperation, “United States: China Science and Technology Cooperation,” December 2006, https://2001-2009.state.gov/documents/organization/96437.pdf (accessed 2 October 2016).

6. Kathlin Smith, “The Role of Scientists in Normalizing U.S.–China Relations: 1965–1979,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 866, no. 1 (December 1998), http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09149.x/abstract (accessed 3 October 2016).

7. “U.S.-China Joint Statement,” The White House, 17 November 2009, https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/us-china-joint-statement (accessed 1 October 2016).

8. “Science and Technology are Primary Productive Forces in 1988,” People’s Daily Online, 9 October 2008, http://en.people.cn/90002/95589/6512392.html (accessed 3 October 2016).

9. Jeffrey Goldberg, “Reagan Backs Plans to Launch Satellites from China Rockets,” The Washington Post, 10 September 1988, https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/business/1988/09/10/reagan-backs-plan-to-launch-satellites-from-china-rockets/8d297820-e22f-4ef2-a66d-3d275377ad05/ (accessed 3 October 2016).

10. “Cox Report,” United States House of Representatives, http://www.house.gov/coxreport/body/ch9bod.html (accessed 3 October 2016).

11. “China—United States: Agreements Regarding Commercial Satellite Launches,” International Legal Materials 28, no. 3 (1989, May): 596–610.

12. See note 10.

13. Ibid.

14. James Lewis, Regulating Satellite Exports, Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2 May 2003, https://www.csis.org/analysis/regulating-satellite-exports (accessed 3 October 2016).

15. Shirley Kan, China: Possible Missile Technology Transfers from U.S. Satellite Export PolicyActions and Chronology, Report no. 98–485 F, Congressional Research Service, 11 January 2002, http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/crs/98-485.pdf (accessed 4 October 2016).

16. C. V. Anderson, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): Background, Issues, Bibliography (New York, NY: Nova Science Pub Inc., 2002), 61.

17. “The Cox Report: Chapter 4 PRC Missile and Space Forces,” The Washington Post, 25 May 1999, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/daily/may99/coxreport/chapter4.htm (accessed 5 October 2016).

18. Eric Pooley, “Red Face over China,” CNN, 1 June 1998, http://edition.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1998/05/25/time/china.missles.html (accessed 5 October 2016).

19. James Bennet, “Clinton Says Chinese Money Did Not Influence U.S. Policy,” The New York Times, 18 May 1998, http://www.nytimes.com/1998/05/18/us/clinton-says-chinese-money-did-not-influence-us-policy.html?_r=0 (accessed 5 October 2016).

20. H.R. Public Law 105–261, 105 Cong. (1998) (enacted), https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-105publ261/pdf/PLAW-105publ261.pdf.

21. James Lewis, “Preserving America’s Strength in Satellite Technology,” Center for Strategic and International Studies, 1 April 2003, https://www.csis.org/analysis/preserving-americas-strength-satellite-technology (accessed 5 October 2016).

22. Yang Jingjie, “US Excludes China from Satellite Deal,” Global Times, 1 July 2013, http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/754153.shtml (accessed 6 October 2016).

23. Daryl Kimball and Kingston Reif, “The Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty at a Glance,” Arms Control Association, 1 January 2003, https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/abmtreaty (accessed 5 October 2016).

24. Tom Collina, “Dumping the ABM Treaty: Was It Worth It?” Arms Control Now, 12 June 2012, https://armscontrolnow.org/2012/06/12/2969/ (accessed 5 October 2016).

25. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, U.S. National Space Policy, 2006, http://history.nasa.gov/ostp_space_policy06.pdf (accessed 6 October 2016).

26. “Weaponizing Space: Is Current U.S. Policy Protecting our National Security?” Hearing before the Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs, 23 May 2007, https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-110hhrg37094/html/CHRG-110hhrg37094.htm (accessed 6 October 2016) .

27. Ashley Tellis and C. Raja Mohan, “The Strategic Rationale for Deeper U.S.-Indian Economic Ties,” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2015, http://carnegieendowment.org/files/US_India_TellisMohan_Final.pdf (accessed 6 October 2016).

28. Proceedings of India-U.S. Conference on Space Science, Applications and Commerce: Strengthening and Expanding Cooperation, Bangalore, 21–25 June 2004, https://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/hqlibrary/documents/o60391985.pdf (accessed 6 October 2016).

29. Hannah Kohler, “The Eagle and the Hare: U.S.–Chinese Relations, the Wolf Amendment, and the Future of International Cooperation in Space,” The Georgetown Law Journal 103, no. 4 (2015). https://georgetownlawjournal.org/articles/52/eagle-hare-u-s-chinese-relations (accessed 7 October 2016).

30. Leonard David, “US-China Space Freeze May Thaw with Historic New Experiment,” Space.com, 21 August 2015, http://www.space.com/30337-chinese-experiment-international-space-station.html (accessed 7 October 2016).

31. Cindy Hao, “Chinese Journalists Barred from Shuttle Launch,” Science, 20 May 2011, http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2011/05/chinese-journalists-barred-shuttle-launch (accessed 8 October 2016).

32. 2011 Report to Congress of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, 2011, http://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/annual_reports/annual_report_full_11.pdf (accessed 8 October 2016).

33. Jim Finkle et al., “NASA Says was Hacked 13 Times Last Year,” Reuters, 2 March 2012, http://www.reuters.com/article/us-nasa-cyberattack-idUSTRE8211G320120303 (accessed 8 October 2016).

34. Richard Schmitt, “Chinese Suspected in Capitol Hacking Cases,” Los Angeles Times, 12 June 2008, http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jun/12/nation/na-hackers12 (accessed 9 October 2016).

35. Mary Flaherty et al., “Chinese Hack U.S. Weather Systems, Satellite Network,” The Washington Post, 12 November 2014, https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/chinese-hack-us-weather-systems-satellite-network/2014/11/12/bef1206a-68e9-11e4-b053-65cea7903f2e_story.html (accessed 9 October 2016).

36. China Manned Space, “About CMSP,” http://en.cmse.gov.cn/col/col71/index.html (accessed 9 October 2016).

37. Dean Cheng, “Prospects for U.S.-China Space Cooperation” (Heritage Foundation), http://www.heritage.org/research/testimony/2014/04/prospects-for-us-china–space-cooperation#_ftn1 (accessed 9 October 2016).

38. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, HR 4310, 112 Cong. (2013) (enacted), https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr4310enr/pdf/BILLS-112hr4310enr.pdf (accessed 9 October 2016).

39. “U.S.-China Strategic & Economic Dialogue Outcomes of the Strategic Track,” U.S. Department of State, 24 June 2015, http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2015/06/244205.htm (accessed 9 October 2016).

40. “The First Meeting of the U.S.-China Space Dialogue,” U.S. Department of State, 28 September 2015, http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2015/09/247394.htm (accessed 10 October 2016).

41. “NASA Administrator Departs China after ‘Rewarding’ First Visit,” National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 28 September 2006, http://www.nasa.gov/about/highlights/griffin_china.html (accessed 10 October 2016).

42. Tariq Malik, “China has Not Been Invited to Join International Space Station, NASA Says,” Space.com, 28 June 2010, http://www.space.com/8675-china-invited-join-international-space-station-nasa.html (accessed 10 October 2016).

43. Kevin Pollpeter et al., “China Dream, Space Dream: China’s Progress in Space Technologies and Implications for the United States,” U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, 2 March 2015, http://origin.www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Research/ChinaDream Space Dream_Report.pdf (accessed 11 October 2016).

44. Frank Morring Jr., “NASA, China Meet on Possible Cooperation,” Aviation Week, 16 January 2014, http://aviationweek.com/space/nasa-china-meet-possible-cooperation (accessed 11 October 2016) .

45. Frank Morring Jr., “Bolden Meets Human-Spaceflight Chief During China Visit,” Aviation Week, 3 December 2014, http://aviationweek.com/space/bolden-meets-human-spaceflight-chief-during-china-visit (accessed 12 October 2016).

46. Leonard David, “Under a China Moon: The Politics of Cooperation in Space,” Space.com, 13 December 2013, http://www.space.com/23965-china-moon-rover-landing-cooperation.html (accessed 11 October 2016).

47. Marcia Smith, “U.S. and Chinese Academies of Sciences Create Forum for Space Science Interchanges,” Space Policy Online, 19 January 2014, http://www.spacepolicyonline.com/news/u-s-and-chinese-academies-of-sciences-create-forum-for-space-science-interchanges (accessed 11 October 2016).

48. “Exhibition: Qian Xue-sen: A Man of Science and an Inspiration to Scholars,” California Institute of Technology, October 2015, http://www.caltech.edu/content/exhibition-qian-xue-sen-man-science-and-inspiration-scholars (accessed 12 October 2016).

49. “China to Launch Space Station Core Module in 2018,” Chinese Academy of Sciences, 3 March 2017, http://english.cas.cn/newsroom/china_research/201703/t20170303_174538.shtml (accessed 12 October 2016).

50. “Russians May Visit China’s Orbital Module-Space Agency,” TASS Russian News Agency, 12 November 2014, http://tass.com/non-political/759316 (accessed 12 October 2016).

51. “Mars 500: Study Overview,” European Space Agency, 12 October 2012, http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Human_Spaceflight/Mars500/Mars500_study_overview (accessed 12 October 2016).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 568.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.