609
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Counterintuitive, Yet Essential: Taking Stock of Organizational Unlearning Research Through a Scientometric Analysis (1976-2019)

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 152-174 | Received 09 Mar 2020, Accepted 08 Jun 2021, Published online: 08 Aug 2021
 

ABSTRACT

With the growth in the literature on organisational unlearning (OU), there is a commensurate increase in the diversity of its knowledge base. Past studies have carried out narrative and systematic reviews to synthesise the research on OU. But none of them have specifically addressed the questions about leading indicators like most influential articles, authors, and journals of unlearning publications. Moreover, previous studies have not studied the inter-relationship of unlearning with other concepts/disciplines. This study addresses these shortcomings and it is also the first attempt to perform a scientometric analysis of OU. In addition, to establish the linkages between unlearning and other concepts/disciplines, co-occurrence of keyword analysis is used. Unlearning shares an intense association with organisational learning, knowledge management, organisational change, innovation, and forgetting. Later, we discuss several implications that can help improve the present arguments and simultaneously shape the future research of OU.

Acknowledgment

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 79th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management held in Boston, Massachusetts, in August 2019. The authors acknowledge the inputs received from the participants of the session.

In addition, the authors gratefully acknowledge the three anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions and constructive comments for this paper. Furthermore, the authors would like to thank Prof. Thomas Jackson, Editor-in-Chief, Knowledge Management Research & Practice journal.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1. This derivation relates to Appendix 1 where Lotka's Law of Author Productivity is explained.The derivation is as follows: Dividing both sides of equation 1 by ∑ YX:

YxYx=cYxYxxn
Solving further,
YxYx=c1xn
Taking ∑ i.e., total sample of authors, we get:
YxYx=c1xn
or,
c=11/xn.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee [IIT/GIC-12/2019/10]; Indian Council of Social Science Research [CON/178/2019-ICS]; University Grants Commission Junior Research Fellowship Scheme in Sciences, Humanities and Social Sciences [1071/(NET-DEC. 2015)].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 233.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.