143
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

The importance of malapposition in angiographically optimized stenting in contemporaneous interventions

&
Pages 599-605 | Received 30 Mar 2018, Accepted 22 Jun 2018, Published online: 12 Jul 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Stenting has advanced the treatment of coronary artery disease, with angiography being historically the gold standard to assure adequate stent deployment. However, intravascular imaging modalities including intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography have shown high rates of inadequate stent deployment in angiographically optimized stents. The association of malapposition with adverse clinical outcomes remains controversial.

Areas covered: The definition, types, and risk factors for metallic stent malapposition, the natural history, and significance of stent strut malapposition and its correlation with short- and long-term outcomes were reviewed.

Expert commentary: Using intravascular imaging, acute stent strut malapposition is very common, occurring in >75% in some studies. Malapposition may be a result of inadequate stent deployment technique or the atherosclerotic process itself. The preponderance of available data suggests that acute malapposition is not associated with worsened outcomes. Late acquired malapposition may be associated with a relatively increased event rate for stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction but the increased risk is quite small (<0.01%) in absolute terms. Use of a classification system based on cause rather than simple presence of malapposition may clarify some of the uncertainties regarding the clinical significance of strut malapposition.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Sri Vallurupalli for his critical review and helpful suggestions.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 611.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.