The limits of discipline, or how to make sense of the state of the world

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size

Notes

1 See my The Foreign Encounter in Myth and Religion (London: Pluto, 2010), Chapter 1.

3 Ibid., 16.

2 Joseph A. Camilleri and Jim Falk, Worlds in Transition: Evolving Governance across a Stressed Planet (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2009).

4 Karl Polanyi, The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (Boston: Beacon, 1957 [1944]), 141.

5 See my A Survey of Global Political Economy, http://www.sussex.ac.uk/ir/research/gpe/gpesurvey/, Chapter 5.

6 Camilleri and Falk, Worlds in Transition, 47.

7 Ibid., 556–7.

8 Ibid., 9.

9 Ibid., 10–11, emphasis added.

10 Ibid., 160.

11 Ibid., 267.

12 Ibid., 77.

13 Stephen Gill, ‘European Governance and New Constitutionalism. Economic and Monetary Union and Alternatives to Disciplinary Neoliberalism in Europe’, New Political Economy 3, no. 1 (1998): 5–26.

14 Van der Pijl, A Survey of Global Political Economy, Chapters 1 and 2.

15 James Lovelock, The Revenge of Gaia, foreword C. Tickell (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 2007), 6.

16 Léon Poliakov and Joseph Wulf, eds., Das Dritte Reich und seine Denker (Wiesbaden: Fourier, 1989 [1959]).

17 John Bellamy Foster, ‘On the Laws of Capitalism. 1. Insights from the Sweezy–Schumpeter Debate’, Monthly Review 63, no. 1 (2011): 1–11.

18 Antonio Gramsci, ‘The Revolution against “Capital”, in Selections from Political Writings 1910–1920, trans. and ed. Q. Hoare (New York: International Publishers, 1977), 35–6.

19 Camilleri and Falk, Worlds in Transition, 295.

20 Ibid., 298.

21 Joan Robinson, ‘The Second Crisis of Economic Theory’, The American Economic Review 62, no. 1/2 (1972): 1–10.