Theresa May, the Brexit negotiations and the two-level game, 2017–2019

ABSTRACT

For the two years between the activation of article 50 of the Lisbon treaty and the expected withdrawal on 29 March 2019, Theresa May was confronted with an apparently classical two-level game, where she needed to find a compromise between what Brussels could find acceptable, especially as far as trade relations were concerned, and what her domestic constituency demanded. This was made more complex by the fact that the latter was itself divided between Remainers, Soft and Hard Brexiters and multiple other sub-groups. Based on a discursive institutionalist approach, this article suggests that the Prime Minister was caught in a contradiction between her ‘hard’ rhetoric at home and the reality of her bargaining position in Brussels. Tsebelis’ nested games theory explains why her communicative discourse was politically rational but ultimately incompatible with the reality of the European power game.

KEYWORDS:

• Theresa May
• Brexit
• negotiations; two-level game

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Notes

1. For their comments on earlier drafts, I would like to thank Filipa Figueira, Emmanuelle Avril, Vivien A. Schmidt, Nicholas Startin and the other authors of this special issue.

2. “European leaders can ‘go whistle’ over EU divorce bill, says Boris Johnson.” The Guardian, 11 July 2017.

3. “Labour should commit to staying in the single market and customs union”, The Observer, 23 September 2017.

4. “May’s weakness exposed as DUP derails Brexit process”, The Guardian, 4 December 2017.

5. “Free movement could go on during post-Brexit transition, says May”, The Guardian, 4 April 2017; “Cabinet accepts Brexit transition will mean years of free movement”, The Guardian, 20 July 2017.

6. “UK government concedes transitional role for ECJ after Brexit”, Financial Times, 11 July 2017.

7. “‘A fantasy’: EU leaders dismiss UK’s post-Brexit customs plan”, The Guardian, 15 August 2017.

8. “Brexit divorce bill: UK could pay £50bn after bowing to EU pressure”, The Guardian, 29 November 2017; “May forges surprise consensus as Eurosceptics fall into line”, Financial Times, 30 November 2017.

9. “Theresa May under fire over Brexit transition deal”, The Guardian, 19 March 2018.

10. Quoted in “EU-UK divide poses serious threat to Brexit talks, says Barnier”, The Guardian, 29 June 2018.

11. “Barnier criticises May’s UK-wide Brexit backstop plan”, The Guardian, 8 June 2018.

12. Quoted in “Brexit plan to keep Northern Ireland in customs union triggers row”, The Guardian, 9 February 2018.

13. John Swinney and Michael Russell, ‘Westminster is using Brexit to put devolution at risk. Scotland will not stand for it’, The Guardian, 21 February 2018; ‘Sturgeon accuses UK ministers of threat to veto Scottish powers’, The Guardian, 22 February 2018.

14. ‘Scots and Welsh set up Brexit legislative stand-off with Westminster’, Financial Times, 28 February 2018.

15. ‘Constitutional Crisis looms as MSPs prepare to reject UK’s Brexit Bill’, The Scotsman, 15 May 2018. ‘Scotland withholds consent for Brexit bill’, Financial Times, 16 May 2018.

16. “‘Humiliation’ and ‘disaster’: how the UK press covered May’s Salzburg ordeal”, The Guardian, 21 September 2018.

17. “EU’s brexit hard line angers Theresa May”, Politico, 20 September 2018, https://www.politico.eu/article/theresa-may-reacts-angrily-to-uk-brexit-plan-rejection-eu-summit-salzburg/.

18. “DUP accuses May of breaking Brexit pledge over ‘Irish Sea border’“, The Guardian, 9 November 2018.