ABSTRACT
Soft power has emerged as a topic of growing interest in Chinese foreign policy and its expression gained new salience when it was anchored within the framework of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). This article proposes a comparative analysis of the soft power of China and the European Union (EU) in the context of the BRI and Global Strategy of June 2016. Drawing on the role theory, this study seeks to fill a gap in previous scholarly works, focusing on the soft power dynamics underlying the China–EU relationship, which do not incorporate the BRI as an increasingly influential soft power tool in Chinese foreign policy. It concludes that the BRI and Global Strategy have infused China’s and EU’s soft power, respectively, with innovating aspects; and despite the emergence of some common ground as a result of that, differences between the two actors regarding role conception, role expectation and role performance remain noticeable.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledges that this study was conducted at the Research Center in Political Science (UIDB/CPO/00758/2020), University of Minho/University of Évora, and was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology and the Portuguese Ministry of Education and Science through national funds.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
1. In the EUGS public diplomacy is mentioned only once as an element of ‘strategic communication’. Yet, actions connected to public diplomacy can be found throughout the document and its follow-up reports.
2. See https://www.businessinsider.com/china-social-credit-system-punishments-and-rewards-explained-2018-4
4. It refers to the almost 100 years-period (1839–1949) when China was subjugated by Western powers.
5. See (European Commission Citation2018), https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/erasmus-plus/about_en.LinkManagerBM_FN_AUTO5J8RLJPL