290
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Miscellany

Texture development and deformation mechanisms during uniaxial straining of U–Nb shape-memory alloys

Pages 2593-2609 | Received 03 Dec 2004, Accepted 22 Dec 2004, Published online: 02 Sep 2006
 

Abstract

The shape-memory effect is well documented in uranium–niobium alloys near the α″–γo metastable phase boundary. In situ neutron diffraction measurements during uniaxial loading indicate that U–14 at.% Nb (in the α″ monoclinic phase field) deforms by stress-induced twin reorientation. Alternatively, U–16 at.% Nb (initially γo tetragonal) undergoes a stress-induced phase transformation to the α″ monoclinic phase. The crystallographic texture of the monoclinic phase of both compositions has been measured and qualitatively interpreted by considering the orientation relationship between the most favoured α′′ variant and the parent phase. In addition, previously published observations of deformation structures within the shape-memory regime of a U–13 at.% Nb alloy are discussed within the context of the same model.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr Loren Jacobson for his assistance in creating the plots for . Stimulating discussions with Drs J.P. Hirth and A.G. Crocker are also gratefully acknowledged. Lastly, we would like to thank Alan Patterson and Paul Dunn for their continued support of research in uranium metallurgy. This work was supported under DOE contract No. W-7405-ENG-36.

Notes

Previously published in Vol. 85, No. 13, pp. 1441–1458

Although the actual composition of the alloy investigated by the current authors was U–13 at.% Nb, U–14 at.% Nb was chosen as the nominal composition for the SME alloy. Note that the strains calculated in the ensuing discussion will be slightly different for other compositions (including U–13 at.% and U–16 at.% Nb), but the overall results regarding preferred variants and driving strains for variant switching will be similar.

The proper unit cell for the γo structure is rotated 45° from that of the cubic γ phase. Thus, the ‘a’ lattice parameter of the tetragonal γo phase should be divided by

for comparison to the ‘a’ lattice parameter of the cubic γ phase. See Citation[17] or Citation[23] for more details regarding these structures.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 786.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.