71
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Extension of the Vook–Witt and inverse Vook–Witt elastic grain-interaction models to general loading states

&
Pages 3921-3943 | Received 17 Oct 2006, Accepted 20 Dec 2006, Published online: 14 Aug 2007
 

Abstract

The recently developed Vook–Witt and inverse Vook–Witt elastic grain-interaction models have been employed for the calculation of mechanical elastic constants and diffraction (X-ray) stress factors of, in particular, thin films. However, their applicability is limited to a planar, rotationally symmetric state of macroscopic, mechanical stress. For such a loading state (and an, at least, transversely, elastically isotropic specimen), only two mechanical elastic constants are necessary to describe mechanical elastic behaviour and only the sum of two diffraction (X-ray) stress factors is needed to relate lattice strains to the one independent component of the mechanical stress tensor. The restriction to a planar, rotationally symmetric state of mechanical stress will be removed in this work. Calculation of the full stiffness tensor and all six diffraction (X-ray) stress factors then becomes possible. It was found previously that the Vook–Witt and inverse Vook–Witt models become (but only approximately) equivalent to the Eshelby–Kröner model for certain ideal grain-shape textures. For this reason, results of numerical calculations of mechanical elastic constants and diffraction (X-ray) stress factors, based on the Vook–Witt and inverse Vook–Witt models, will be presented and compared to corresponding results obtained from the Eshelby--Kröner grain-interaction model considering ideal grain-shape (‘morphological’) textures.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to Professor Dr Ir. E. J. Mittemeijer for constructive discussions.

Notes

†Present address: Institut de Recherche en Génie-Civil et Mécanique, GeM–CRTT, 37 Bd. de l'Université, 44602 Saint-Nazaire, France

†Of course, a real polycrystal cannot consist of ellipsoidal grains (only). The ellipsoidal shape is an idealized shape, which is adopted to represent grains with (average) aspect ratios different from 1, whereas a spherical shape is adopted for grains with an (average) aspect ratio of 1.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

S. FréourFootnote

†Present address: Institut de Recherche en Génie-Civil et Mécanique, GeM–CRTT, 37 Bd. de l'Université, 44602 Saint-Nazaire, France

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 786.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.