85
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Nanoscale thermodynamics of multicomponent, elastic, crystalline solids: diamond, silicon, and silicon carbide

&
Pages 427-440 | Received 22 Sep 2007, Accepted 12 Dec 2007, Published online: 13 Feb 2008
 

Abstract

This paper extends the thermodynamic behaviour of two-dimensional and simple three-dimensional crystalline solids developed by Oh et al. and Slattery and Lagoudas to more complex, multicomponent, three-dimensional, elastic, crystalline solids. The analysis recognizes that the Helmholtz free energy is an explicit function of the lattice vectors defining the crystalline structure. From this theory, we obtain the stress-deformation behaviour and the elastic properties of diamond, silicon, and silicon carbide, which are face-centred, cubic, crystal structure. These are compared with available experimental values.

Notes

†It is important to recognize that the approach of Slattery and Lagoudas Citation3, in which the mass density is included as one of independent variables, and our use of equation (Equation11) are fundamentally equivalent as the result of equation (Equation10). The results derived by these two approaches can be used somewhat interchangeably, so long as care is taken to properly recognize the independent variables. Equation (Equation11) has the advantage of being consistent with Green and Adkins Citation15, who further discussed the particular functional dependence upon the six E (m) · (CI) E (n) to be expected for various crystal classes. The approach of Slattery and Lagoudas Citation3 has the advantage of explicitly recognizing the role of thermodynamic pressure in the description of stress–deformation behaviour, in the Euler equation, and in the Gibbs phase rule.

†For a simple three-dimensional crystal, Slattery and Lagoudas Citation3 have obtained a stress–deformation behaviour in terms of the mass density and five invariants. For a simple crystal, the stress–deformation behaviour is fundamentally equivalent to equation (Equation28), as mentioned in the footnote of equation (Equation11). The only difference is values of the coefficient μ(I,mn). The internal lattice vectors e (4), … e (k) introduced to explain internal structures of the complicated three-dimensional solids will affect the coefficients with equation (Equation30).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 786.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.