Abstract
In their recent paper on void ordering, Barashev and Golubov Citation1 describe cavity lattice formation in austenitic steel under electron irradiation as a bubble lattice rather than a void lattice. While this is convenient for the model they propose, this comment gives several reasons why the bubble lattice assignation cannot be justified. In addition, some remarks made by Barashev and Golubov on the results of one-dimensional (1D) Monte Carlo simulations Citation2, and the role of 1D self-interstitial atom clusters in creating the planar ordering found in experimental void lattice formation results Citation3, are critically discussed.