4,606
Views
101
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research articles

Shame, guilt, and remorse: implications for offender populations

, &
Pages 706-723 | Received 12 Feb 2011, Accepted 03 Apr 2011, Published online: 11 Nov 2011
 

Abstract

The emotions shame and guilt may represent a critical stepping stone in the rehabilitation process. Often referred to as ‘moral’ emotions owing to their presumed role in promoting altruistic behavior and inhibiting antisocial behaviors, shame and guilt provide potentially exciting points of intervention with offenders. In this article, we describe current psychological theory and research that underscores important differences between shame and guilt. We note parallels between psychologists’ conceptions of guilt and shame, and criminologists’ conceptions of reintegrative and disintegrative shaming. We summarize recent research investigating the implications of these moral emotions for criminal and risky behavior, with special emphasis on the handful of studies conducted with actual offenders. We conclude with a discussion of implications for treatment in criminal justice settings.

Notes

1. Recently, Zeelenberg and Breugelmans (2008) examined situational antecedents of guilt and regret. They found that regret was experienced in response to both situations involving harm to self and situations involving harm to others, whereas guilt was predominantly experienced in situations involving harm to others.

2. Some psychologists (Ferguson & Stegge, 1998; Luyten et al., 2002) have suggested that the TOSCA family of measures fail to capture pathological forms of guilt. It is important to note that these measures tap feelings of shame and guilt with respect to failures or transgressions for which the person was responsible. The measures do not capture problematic tendencies to take responsibility for situations that are beyond one's reasonable control (e.g. many instances of survivor guilt, O'Connor, Berry, Weiss, Bush, & Sampson, 1997). We agree that problems with guilt are apt to arise when people have an exaggerated or distorted sense of responsibility for events, or when guilt becomes fused with shame (Dearing & Tangney, 2011; Tangney & Dearing, 2002).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 375.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.