![Sample our Education journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5932/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Education.jpg"})
Abstract
In this paper the mathematical working in a series of ‘litter project’ lessons from a South African Mathematical Literacy class is analysed in terms of Kilpatrick, Swafford and Findell's (2001) five strands of mathematical proficiency. The analysis points to evidence of the life skills-oriented Mathematical Literacy frame opening up opportunities for engagement across aspects of all five strands, but shows that the emphases differ from the intra-mathematical emphases within the strands. I argue that this is due to the lack of centrality in the Mathematical Literacy frame of the ‘mathematical terrain’. The shifting of competence to the bridge between mathematics and everyday situations and problems retains mathematical coherence and connectedness. Both of these aspects are grounded in the mathematical tools and thinking that are needed to make sense of the everyday situation, rather than the more intra-mathematical connections and coherence that appear to be in focus within the strands of mathematical proficiency.
Notes
1. The capitalised ‘Mathematical Literacy’ is used throughout this paper to refer specifically to the subject as defined/enacted in the context of the South African FET curriculum. The small ‘mathematical literacy’ is used to refer to the more general project – interpreted in a range of ways – that is referred to as desirable across a range of international mathematics education literature. Overlaps and contrasts between the two are considered later in the paper.