384
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Effect of slope on productivity and cost of Eucalyptus pulpwood harvesting using single-grip purpose-built and excavator-based harvesters

, , &
Pages 74-82 | Received 19 Oct 2017, Accepted 19 Jan 2018, Published online: 18 Apr 2018
 

ABSTRACT

With the emergence of excavator-based harvesters in cut-to-length CTL operations as a potential alternative to purpose-built harvesters, a debate has been opened as to which machine type is the most suitable in the forestry environment. A mechanized Eucalyptus pulpwood CTL operation, was observed to determine the effect of slope on harvester productivity and cost. A 2 × 2 factorial design with two treatments (machine type) against slope and individual tree volume as factors was developed. Two machine types were studied, an excavator-based harvester (Volvo EC210BF), and a purpose-built harvester (TimberPro TL725B), both fitted with Maskiner SP 591 LX harvester heads. A single operator with significant experience on both machines was used throughout the study. The machines worked on a range of slopes, from level to 50% in two separate corridors containing trees of similar volume and form. Continuous slope data was derived using large footprint light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data of the area. Calculations were carried out on each machine to determine which machine was more cost-effective. The productivity of the excavator based harvester decreased by 0.048 m3PMH−1 for every 1% increase in slope, while the productivity of the purpose-built harvester was constant across slope. While the purpose-built harvester was found to have a higher mean productivity the excavator-based harvester was more economical. This suggests that, in terms of economics the excavator-based harvester was more suitable across the conditions encountered in this study.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Dr Dirk Laengin of Mondi Limited for providing the study site and the team from Iningi Contractors for the use of their machines in this study.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 229.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.