934
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Note

Personality traits predict and moderate the outcome of Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic tinnitus

, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 538-544 | Received 03 Oct 2017, Accepted 22 Jan 2018, Published online: 31 Jan 2018
 

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate whether the Big Five personality traits predict the outcome of Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (ICBT) and whether they moderate the outcome between ICBT and face-to-face group cognitive behavioural therapy (GCBT). Design: This study investigated the Big Five personality traits as predictors and moderators of the outcome (tinnitus handicap) in a trial comparing ICBT and GCBT for chronic tinnitus. Study sample: N = 84 patients with chronic tinnitus were randomised to either ICBT (n = 41) or GCBT (n = 43). Results: A multilevel model for discontinuous change was performed. Higher scores on the “openness” scale of the Big Five Personality Inventory (BFI-10) predicted a lower tinnitus handicap (Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, THI) at post-treatment in ICBT (p < 0.05). Openness moderated the outcome at post-treatment in favour of ICBT (p < 0.05). Higher scores on the BFI-10 “conscientiousness” scale predicted a more favourable outcome in ICBT at 6-month (p < 0.05) and 12-month follow-up (p < 0.05), but the BFI-10 “conscientiousness” scale was positively associated with the THI at baseline (p < 0.05). Conclusions: ICBT might be the preferred treatment choice for tinnitus patients being open towards new experiences. Moreover, ICBT requires autonomous work and self-motivation by the patient in order to have an impact.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Vendela Zetterqist Westin for general training on ICBT interventions, Alexander Alasjö and George Vlaescu for support with the website and the employees of the University Outpatient Clinic for Psychotherapy in Mainz for assistance with requests from tinnitus patients.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

This work was supported in parts by the Swedish Research Council (HEAD Linnaeus 18 grant, 349-2007-8654).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported in parts by the Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas and Swedish Research Council (HEAD Linnaeus grant, 349-2007-8654).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 194.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.