1,454
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Developing the auditory processing domains questionnaire (APDQ): a differential screening tool for auditory processing disorder

&
Pages 764-775 | Received 16 Oct 2017, Accepted 04 Jun 2018, Published online: 31 Jul 2018
 

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop a screening questionnaire for auditory processing disorder (APD).

Design: Fifty-two questions were created to enable parent/teacher proxies to rate students listening skills in terms of auditory processing, attention and language factors.

Study sample: Parents rated their child’s frequency of competent performance (regularly, often, sometimes or rarely) on 52 questions. Scores were calculated for three scales: auditory processing, attention and language. Data was collected from 198 normal controls, 20 students with auditory processing disorder, 40 students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and 10 students with a learning disability. Subjects were split into a younger group (7–10 y) and an older group (11–17 y).

Results: Factor analysis revealed substantial internal validity. Analysis of external validity using a regression model revealed significant differences between normal and clinical groups for all scales (p < 0.001) and also significantly separated the three clinical groups. A group differential analysis of scale score results clearly demonstrated inter-group differences at 89% (on average) sensitivity and specificity levels.

Conclusion: The auditory processing domains questionnaire appears to be an effective screening questionnaire for APD with scale score patterns likely to be helpful in making appropriate clinical referrals.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Kaiser Hawaii Center for Health Research for enabling the collection of the subject data, Tim Holmes for developing the Excel scoring sheet and Mark Seeto for statistical advice. We also thank Harvey Dillon and Sharon Cameron for their helpful assistance.

Declaration of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 194.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.