403
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Notes

Temporary threshold shift following ear canal microsuction

A comparative analysis measuring hearing levels before, immediately and 1-week after earwax removal by microsuction

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 713-718 | Received 20 Jun 2019, Accepted 20 Mar 2020, Published online: 13 Apr 2020
 

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate a temporary threshold shift (TTS) of hearing and pain/discomfort caused by the microsuction procedure. Hearing loss induced by impacted cerumen was also investigated.

Design: Impacted cerumen was removed from patients using microsuction. Hearing assessments were carried out before the procedure, immediately after and 1-week later. Hearing thresholds measured in different sessions were compared to determine the TTS caused by the microsuction procedure and hearing loss induced by impacted cerumen. A questionnaire was used to evaluate the pain/discomfort experienced by patients.

Study Sample: 30 patients (50 ears) were recruited from a cerumen removal clinic.

Results: Significant hearing loss caused by impacted earwax was found across individual frequencies (mean 11.4 dB, maximum 38.1 dB). A TTS appeared in 43/50 (86%) ears, ranging from 0 to 16.2 dB averaged across frequencies between 0.25 and 8 kHz, with the highest TTS at 6 kHz. Pain and discomfort levels were both rated low, the mean levels were 1.2 (SD = 0.5) and 1.6 (SD = 0.5) respectively on a scale from 1 to 10.

Conclusions: Microsuction appears to be a well-tolerated and preferred procedure for removing impacted cerumen. Because of the significant TTS induced by the microsuction procedure, safety concerns from a hearing perspective should be raised with the patient.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Audiology Medical Services Ltd for supplying patients, resources and equipment and also Mrs Linda Thompson and Ms Claire Sheehan for assisting with data collection. The authors thank the anonymous reviewers and Dr Ross Roeser for their helpful suggestions. The authors also acknowledge Dr Christopher Wigham for his proof reading.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 194.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.