281
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Vestibular function in adults with intellectual disabilities: feasibility and outcome of a vestibular screening protocol in Special Olympics athletes

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 446-457 | Received 11 Jun 2020, Accepted 05 Oct 2020, Published online: 24 Oct 2020
 

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a well-adapted vestibular screening battery to objectively examine the (peripheral) vestibular function, and to explore the characteristics of potential vestibular deficits in the adult ID population.

Design

Cross-sectional study design.

Study sample

Compared to an age- and gender-weighted control group, a heterogeneous group of forty-five adults with ID participated in the vestibular screening at the National Games of Special Olympics Belgium (2019), which consisted of a bone conduction cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (cVEMP) measurement and video Head Impulse Test (vHIT).

Results

The screening battery appeared to be feasible in the majority of the participants (cVEMP: 92%; vHIT: 72%). Overall, the occurrence of abnormal cVEMP and vHIT responses was significantly higher in the ID group, with significantly lower corrected peak-to-peak cVEMP amplitudes (p < 0.001), lower vHIT gains (p < 0.001), and higher cVEMP and vHIT asymmetry ratios in the ID group (p = 0.008 and p < 0.001 resp.).

Conclusions

Vestibular assessment using the cVEMP and vHIT technique shows a promising feasibility in adults with ID. In addition, this study suggests that people with ID exhibit an increased prevalence of (peripheral) vestibular deficits relative to the general population.

Acknowledgments

All authors substantially contributed to the article. Under the supervision and with support of Leen Maes, Laura Leyssens and Ruth Van Hecke contributed to the development of the study design, performed the vestibular screening during Special Olympics Belgium (SOB) 2019, executed the analyses and interpretation of the data, drafted the initial manuscript, and improved revised versions. Karlien Moons and Sofie Luypaert assisted in the data collection during SOB 2019, performed the data input and assisted during statistical analyses. In addition, Maya Danneels, Cleo Dhondt, Sarie Martens, and Melina Willems assisted during the development of the study design and interpretation of the results. All authors critically reviewed and revised the manuscript, and approved the final manuscript as submitted and are accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure statement

None of the authors have conflicts of interest or financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This study was funded by the Research Foundation Flanders (Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek) as part of a project grant [‘FWO OPR 2018 006901’].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 194.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.