152
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Simplified cochlear frequency selectivity assessment in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners

& ORCID Icon
Pages 326-333 | Received 09 Aug 2022, Accepted 24 Mar 2023, Published online: 19 Apr 2023
 

Abstract

Objective

The ear’s spectral resolution or frequency selectivity (FS) is a fundamental aspect of hearing but is not routinely measured in clinical practice. This study evaluated a simplified FS testing procedure for clinical use by replacing the time-consuming two-interval forced choice (2IFC) method with method of limits (MOL) carried out using a custom-made software and consumer-grade equipment.

Design and study sample

Study 1 compared the FS measure obtained with MOL and 2IFC procedure at two centre frequencies (CFs) (1 and 4 kHz) in 21 normal-hearing listeners. Study 2 determined the FS measure using MOL at five CFs (0.5–8 kHz) in 32 normal-hearing and nine sensorineural hearing loss listeners and compared them with their thresholds in quiet.

Results

FS measurements with MOL and 2IFC methods were highly correlated and had statistically comparable intra-subject test-retest reliability. FS measures determined with MOL were reduced in the hearing-impaired compared to normal-hearing listeners at the CF corresponding to their hearing loss. Linear regression analysis showed significant relationship between FS deterioration and quiet threshold loss (p < 0.0001, R2 = 0.56).

Conclusions

The simplified and affordable FS testing method can be used alongside audiometry to provide additional information about the cochlear function.

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Dr Hong Yet Hoi for aiding in study design. Prof. Geoff Hammond (University of Western Australia) provided the original LabVIEW codes for the 2IFC task.

Ethical approval

Ethics approval was obtained from University of Malaya Medical Centre-Medical Research Ethic Committee (UMMC-MREC, ID No: 2020311-8375) and all volunteers provided informed consent.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by University of Malaya Faculty Research Grant (GPF005A-2020).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 194.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.