Abstract
Evaluating the credibility of the respondent’s cognitive and psychological complaints is a core component of forensic mental health assessment. The Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) and a new IOP-Memory module (IOP-M) are designed specifically for that purpose. Initial research suggests that they might provide practitioners with a quick and thus potentially efficient check of an examinee’s presentation credibility, based on the integration of both symptom and performance validity indicators. To contribute to emerging research on this topic, this study used a simulation design to examine the validity of the IOP-29 and IOP-M and their robustness in detecting coached feigning of schizophrenia. It is the first to extend this duo of measures to a French sample. Results from 115 volunteers supported the effectiveness of both IOP instruments. Because all participants were male, however, our findings may not generalize to females.
Acknowledgments
We thank Meaghan McKenna for proofreading the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
Luciano Giromini and Donald J. Viglione declare that they are members of the LLC that possesses the rights to Inventory of Problems. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Notes
1 This is not an actual item of the test, it only serves to demonstrate the principle. For test security and copyright reasons, the actual items of the IOP-29 are not reported here.