120
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A snapshot look at replication and statistical reporting practices in psychology journals

ORCID Icon &
Pages 204-229 | Received 19 Mar 2019, Accepted 01 Oct 2019, Published online: 29 Oct 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Current efforts started in 2012 by the Association for Psychological Science (APS) appear to be different from previous arguments against null hypothesis statistical testing (NHST), which remained largely rhetorical without specific actions for compliance by researchers in psychology. The APS advocacy involves specific promising implementation tactics. The present study examined the impact of those efforts on replication and statistical reporting practices in four psychology journals from 2011 and 2015. The results showed that amidst increased reporting of NHST statistics in 2015 compared to 2011 and an absence of power reporting in the behavioral journals, there was increased reporting of actual replications in Psychological Science, paradoxically surpassing Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, of CIs in all four journals, and of error bars on graphs in Cognition and Behavioural Processes. These trends suggest need for additional efforts at propagating the APS initiatives to ensure greater impact in the broader psychological community. Additionally, psychologists from all domains need to become advocates of best practices for sustainable impact.

Acknowledgments

We thank Arshiya Mariam for conducting some tallies on select issues of PS.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Author Contributions

AI completed tallies on JEAB and PS and MF completed tallies on COG and BP. AI and MF jointly prepared earliest drafts of the paper; AI performed tally checks, conducted additional analyses, and developed themes in the introduction and discussion.

Ethical Considerations

This study involved no human participants or animals and therefore did not require an Institutional Review Board approval.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 336.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.