Attention, Perception, and Perceived Effects: Negative Political Advertising in a Battleground State of the 2004 Presidential Election

Abstract

Based on a statewide telephone survey before the 2004 presidential election, this study probes Ohioans' attention to and perception of campaign advertising and the perceived effects of those negative political ads. Citizens in this “battleground” state had a very high level of awareness of campaign advertising, characterizing it as more negative than in the past. Self-reported attention to the campaign and measured use of local and national television news were related to perceived campaign negativity. Evidence of a third-person effect regarding a specific type of negative advertising was found. However, the effect was moderated by candidate choice.

Notes

^a N = 516.

^b N = 509.

^c N = 504.

^d N = 504.

^a N = 234.

^b N = 196.

^c N = 74.

^d X ²(2) = 18.88, p < .0001.

^e X ²(6) = 33.20, p < .0001.

^f F(1, 450) = 6.805, p = .009.

^g F(1, 450) = 5.001, p = .026.

^h X ²(6) = 13.85, p = .031.

ⁱ F(3, 465) = 2.73, p = .04.

^j F(3, 465) = .51, p = .67.

^a N = 214.

^b N = 189.

^c X ²(3) = 177.16, p < .001.

^a N = 508.

^b N = 507.

^c N = 57.

^d N = 411.

^e X ²(2) = 9.75, p = .008.

^f N = 206.

^g N = 183.

^h X ²(1) = 2.32, p = .12.

ⁱ X ²(2) = 5.83, p < .05.