11,081
Views
61
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Sexism, rape myths and feminist identification explain gender differences in attitudes toward the #metoo social media campaign in two countries

, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 818-843 | Published online: 25 Oct 2018
 

ABSTRACT

On October 15, 2017, actress Alyssa Milano popularized the #metoo campaign, which sought to expose the prevalence of sexual harassment and assault in public domains by encouraging victims to share their experiences on social media using the hashtag metoo. The online campaign rapidly grew to a global phenomenon, which was generally well supported. However, some criticized the campaign online as a battle of the sexes, which pits men against women. Our cross-cultural research investigated whether gender differences in attitudes and feelings toward #metoo are due to underlying differences in ideologies and experiences that only partly overlap with gender. We surveyed respondents in the United States, where the campaign began, and in Norway, a highly gender-egalitarian country. In both countries, men expressed less positivity toward #metoo than women and perceived it as substantially more harmful and less beneficial. These gender differences were largely accounted for by men being higher than women in hostile sexism, higher in rape myth acceptance, and lower in feminist identification. The results, hence, suggest that gender differences in attitudes to social media campaigns such as #metoo might be best characterized as dimensional ideological differences rather than fundamental group differences.

Acknowledgments

We thank Kristoffer Asp, Frida Bordenich Ballo, Inger Helene Godø, Anette Haug, Felix Koppe, Annahita Sayadian, August Schartau, Henriette Ekeland Svenningsen, Lina Tosterud, Frøydis Johannessen Woldstad, and Aisha Zarar for helping designing the study and collecting the data in Norway.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1. The supplementary materials include outlier analyses, measurement invariance tests, detailed statistical information for group comparisons and follow-up path analyses.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Norwegian Research Council [231157/F10]

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 391.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.