2,130
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Feeling transcendent? Measuring psychophysiological responses to self-transcendent media content

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, &
Pages 359-384 | Published online: 08 Dec 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Self-transcendent media experiences are thought to involve cognitive engagement and mixed affect, leading to psychological well-being. The current study investigated whether these characteristics were reflected in viewers’ psychophysiological responses and sharing intentions. Multilevel model analyses revealed that viewers (n = 57) allocated more cognitive resources to encoding (heart rate), experienced greater physiological arousal (skin conductance level), and less positive but greater negative affect (facial electromyography), and were more motivated to share content (prosociality) when exposed to self-transcendent videos relative to humorous videos. Moreover, specific self-transcendent portrayals (appreciation of beauty and excellence, gratitude, and hope) elicited greater cognitive effort and mixed affect relative to the average response of these videos. In line with emotional flow, cognitive resources increased after the transformational scene in each self-transcendent video, which was accompanied by a negative-to-positive emotional trajectory shift wherein negative emotion remained statistically the same but positive emotion increased. The current study provides initial evidence for theoretical development into the ways that self-transcendent content and narrative structure influence cognitive and affective responses and prosocial intentions.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the following colleagues who assisted with data collection and extraction: Joshua Hendrickse, Jonmichael Seibert, Rachel Secharan, and Madison Wilde. Also, this project was made possible through the support of a grant from the John Templeton Foundation (Grant # 58826). The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the John Templeton Foundation.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1. An a priori power analysis was conducted to determine the necessary sample size considering the design and physiological dependent variables. The analysis yielded N = 56 with f = .15 (Potter & Bolls, Citation2012), power = .8, and five measurements.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the John Templeton Foundation [55826].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 391.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.