ABSTRACT
Socially excluded individuals often use media to cope with their feelings of loneliness, restore threatened needs, and regulate their emotions. However, social exclusion experiences have often been studied from a social-psychological perspective, with little consideration of media-specific characteristics. Thus, this paper aims to identify which different media applications individuals use to overcome social exclusion experiences and how effective this is in terms of need restoration and emotion regulation. A systematic review yielded 119 studies investigating 274 coping tools and 134 underlying strategies. Results indicated that media represent multifunctional tools that enable behavioral approach, behavioral avoidance, cognitive approach, and cognitive avoidance coping. Overall, using these tools was effective in 59% of all cases, with different strategies being linked to more or less effectiveness. By highlighting the theoretical implications of these findings, this paper provides six suggestions that can guide future research within this field.
Acknowledgments
We thank Sophie Raschka for her assistance in coding the literature.
Disclosure Statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Data Availability Statement
The data described in this article are openly available in the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/k8qwx/.
Open Scholarship
This article has earned the Center for Open Science badges for Open Data and Open Materials through Open Practices Disclosure. The data and materials are openly accessible at https://osf.io/k8qwx/.
Notes
1. Given the methodological focus of RQ4, this section only summarizes how different boundary conditions were operationalized within the coded studies. Although going beyond the scope of this review, interested readers can find theoretically-driven arguments on how selected boundary conditions may impact the effectiveness of specific coping strategies in OSF file A11.