ABSTRACT
Collocated dating couples have the choice between interacting in person or via communication media, inviting theorizing about when and why they gravitate toward mediated communication. Drawing on O’Sullivan’s (2000) model, we investigated young adults’ preference for texting over face-to-face (FtF) communication in situations varying in threat (mundane talk vs. difficult conversations vs. breakups), as a function of individuals’ social anxiety and perceptions of media affordances. Results show that higher social anxiety predicted preferences for texting, and this relationship got stronger as relational episodes were more threatening. The perceived importance of editability mediated the relationship between social anxiety and preferences for texting under threatening circumstances. The results shed light on the factors that drive media preferences in relational contexts.
Disclosure Statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Data availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/en86p/?view_only=88e66ffa782d4724b06d687a28c37d71
Supplementary Material
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2023.2246895
Notes
1. Due to a technological malfunction, only 148 participants reported the manipulation checks.