132
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Conservation Aquaculture of Northern Leatherside Chub and Effects of Temperature on Egg Survival

, &
Pages 289-296 | Received 31 Jan 2011, Accepted 12 Sep 2011, Published online: 05 Jun 2012
 

Abstract

We present 4 years of data that refine aquaculture protocols for the northern leatherside chub Lepidomeda copei, a species of conservation concern in the Intermountain West. Experiments examined life history traits (age at first spawning and thermal limits to egg hatching success) and aquaculture techniques (brood density, spawning substrate type and surface area, and feeding methods for fry). Tests showed that leatherside chub can reproduce as early as age 2. Multiple spawns per female during a year were also documented. Survival of eggs was compared at incubation temperatures of 18.4, 23.0, 24.6, and 26.8°C. Eggs at 18.4°C had the highest survival to hatching (54.0%); eggs at 26.8°C had significantly lower survival (1.5%). Egg survival at 23.0°C and 24.6°C (32–33%) was significantly lower than survival at 18.4°C. Aquaculture experiments showed that the mean total number of eggs produced did not significantly differ between brood densities of 8.4 (1,246 ± 1,236 eggs [mean ± SD]) or 16.8 (2,224 ± 1,600 eggs) fish/m3. Studies showed that leatherside chub preferred spawning over natural cobble substrate to spawning over marble substrate. More eggs were recovered from a three-substrate tray treatment (1,350 cm2) than from a single tray treatment (450 cm2). Fry given brine shrimp Artemia spp. with probiotic bacteria or fed with an automated, more continuous drip feeder did not show any advantages in growth over time. Juveniles at rearing densities of 800, 1,700, and 3,400 fish/m3 did not differ significantly in growth rates, deformities, or mortalities. This research provides general guidelines for rearing northern leatherside chub and some additional information on the species’ life history.

Received January 31, 2011; accepted September 12, 2011

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Funding was provided by the Utah State Wildlife Grant program and the Utah Endangered Species Mitigation Fund. Additional support was provided by the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources. We thank Paul Thompson, Aaron Webber, and Samuel Mckay of the Utah Division of Wildlife for their help in collecting the broodstock used to provide eggs for this study. We also thank Chris Wilson for his help in prophylactic treatment of the brood on arrival for external and internal parasites.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

There are no offers available at the current time.

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.