Comparison of Trees and Grasses for Rhizoremediation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons

Abstract

Rhizoremediation of petroleum contaminants is a phytoremediation process that depends on interactions among plants, microbes, and soils. Trees and grasses are commonly used for phytoremediation, with trees typically being chosen for remediation of BTEX while grasses are more commonly used for remediation of PAHs and total petroleum hydrocarbons. The objective of this review was to compare the effectiveness of trees and grasses for rhizoremediation of hydrocarbons and address the advantages of each vegetation type. Grasses were more heavily represented in the literature and therefore demonstrated a wider range of effectiveness. However, the greater biomass and depth of tree roots may have greater potential for promoting environmental conditions that can improve rhizoremediation, such as increased metabolizable organic carbon, oxygen, and water. Overall, we found little difference between grasses and trees with respect to average reduction of hydrocarbons for studies that compared planted treatments with a control. Additional detailed investigations into plant attributes that most influence hydrocarbon degradation rates should provide data needed to determine the potential for rhizoremediation with trees or grasses for a given site and identify which plant characteristics are most important.

KEY WORDS:

• phytoremediation
• bioremediation
• rhizosphere
• organic pollutants
• roots
• microbes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to acknowledge Kate Farthing for her inspiration for this paper and Elizabeth Nichols for critically reviewing the manuscript. Additionally, we thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback.