Demand-Driven E-book Program in Tallinn University of Technology Library: The First Two Years of Experience with the EBL Platform

ABSTRACT

The ease and effectiveness of patron-driven (demand-driven) acquisitions has helped to optimize many academic libraries’ acquisitions budgets. Libraries are increasingly turning to e-books as an alternative to purchasing multiple copies. Academic libraries have for years been forced to purchase large packages of e-books that are of questionable financial value because so much of the content is not used. The number of content units downloaded from large e-book packages by university patrons is not growing. At the same time, the number of checkouts of print books is declining. Advantages of e-books over print are discussed. Also mentioned are a few drawbacks, particularly the fact that European Union countries impose a higher level of value-added tax (VAT) on them than on print books. The author presents a case study analyzing the first two years of experience with the Ebook Library (EBL) platform at the Tallinn University of Technology Library, giving an overview of the advantages and successful measures of demand-driven acquisition in the form of short-term loans.

KEYWORDS:

• Academic libraries
• case study
• demand-driven acquisitions
• EBL
• Ebook Library
• e-books
• English language
• Estonia
• foreign language
• just-in-time
• patron-driven
• science and technology libraries
• short-term loans
• Tallinn University of Technology Library

Notes

^1. Sirigindi Subba Rao, “Electronic Books: Their Integration into Library and Information Centers,” The Electronic Library 23, no. 1 (2005): 118.

^2. Robert Slater, “Why Aren’t E-Books Gaining More Ground in Academic Libraries? E-Book Use and Perceptions: A Review of Published Literature and Research,” Journal of Web Librarianship 4, no. 4 (2010): 305–306, doi:10.1080/19322909.2010.525419.

^3. Peter Hernon, Rosita Hopper, Michael R. Leach, Laura L. Saunders, and Jane Zhang, “E-Book Use by Students: Undergraduates in Economics, Literature, and Nursing,” Journal of Academic Librarianship 33, no. 1 (2007): 3.

^4. Rao, “Electronic Books.”

^5. Heting Chu, “Electronic Books: Viewpoints from Users and Potential Users,” Library Hi Tech 21, no. 3 (2003): 341. doi:10.1108/07378830310494526.

^6. Tracy Tees, “Ereaders in Academic Libraries: A Literature Review,” Australian Library Journal 59, no. 4 (2010): 180. doi:10.1080/00049670.2010.10736023.

^7. Michael Levine-Clark, “Developing a Model for Long-Term Management of Demand-Driven Acquisitions.” Against the Grain 23, no. 3 (2011), Article 9, 24, http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/atg/vol23/iss3/9

^8. Judith M. Nixon, Robert S. Freeman, and Suzanne M. Ward, “Patron-Driven Acquisitions: An Introduction and Literature Review,” Collection Management 35, no. 3–4 (2010): 119–124. doi:/10.1080/01462679.2010.486957.

^9. Trueswell, R. L. “Some Behavioral Patterns of Library Users: The 80/20 Rule,” Wilson Library Bulletin, 43 (1969): 458–61; Allen Kent et al., eds., Use of Library Materials: The University of Pittsburgh Study (New York: Marcel Dekker, 1979).

^10. Kent, Use of Library Materials; Trueswell, “Some Behavioral Patterns”; Leslie J. Reynolds, Carmelita Pickett, Wyoma vanDuinkerken, Jane Smith, Jeanne Harrell, and Sandra Tucker, “User-Driven Acquisitions: Allowing Patron Requests to Drive Collection Development in an Academic Library,” Collection Management 35, no. 3–4 (2010): 244–254. doi:10.1080/01462679.2010.486992.

^11. Kizer Walker, “Patron-Driven Acquisition in U. S. Academic Research Libraries: At the Tipping Point in 2011?” Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis 36, no. 1 (2012): 126–127.

^12. Peggy Johnson, Fundamentals of Collection Development and Management, 3rd ed. (Chicago: American Library Association, 2014), 6.

^13. Nixon, Freeman, and Ward, “Patron-Driven Acquisitions.”

^14. Karen S. Fischer, Michael Wright, Kathleen Clatanoff, Hope Barton, and Edward Shreeves, “Give ’Em What They Want: A One-Year Study of Unmediated Patron-Driven Acquisition of E-Books.” College & Research Libraries 73, no. 5 (2012): 471–472. doi:10.5860/crl-297.

^15. Rajiv Nariani, “E-Books in the Sciences: If We Buy It Will They Use It?” Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship 59 (2009), http://hdl.handle.net/10315/2905.

^16. Carolyn Ann Hughes and Nancy L. Buchanan, “Use of Electronic Monographs in the Humanities and Social Sciences,” Library Hi Tech 19, no 4 (2001): 372. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000006541.

^17. Michael Levine-Clark, “Electronic Book Usage: A Survey at the University of Denver,” Portal: Libraries and the Academy 6, no. 3 (2006): 285, 292. doi:10.1353/pla.2006.0041.

^18. Gordon A. Sabine and Patricia L. Sabine, “How People Use Books and Journals,” Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy 56, no. 4 (1986): 406, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4308046.

^19. Chandra G. Prabha, Duane Rice, and David Cameron, Nonfiction Book Use by Academic Library Users, Research Report Series, OCLC/OR/RR-88/1 (Dublin, OH: OCLC-Online Computer Library Center, Office of Research, 1988), 27.

^20. Mary Summerfield, Carol Mandel, and Paul Kantor, The Online Books Evaluation Project, Columbia University: Final Report (New York: Columbia University, 1999), 93. https://www.academia.edu/1539460/The_online_books_evaluation_project_final_report.

^21. Lesley Nelson and Frances O’Neil, “Electronic Monographs in the Academic Library: An Implementation Story,” LASIE: Library Automated Systems Information Exchange 32, no. 2–3 (2001), 13–20. http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=750429377390385;res=IELHSS.

^22. Summerfield, Mandel, and Kantor, Online Books Evaluation Project, 20.

^23. Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Clifton Snyder, and Lawrence Olszewski, “Geographical Representation of Library Collections in WorldCat: A Prototype,” Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 42, no. 1 (2005): 2–9. doi:10.1002/meet.14504201235.

^24. Fischer et al., “Give ‘Em What They Want,” 491–492.

^25. Lisa Shen, Erin Dorris Cassidy, Eric Elmore, Glenda Griffin, Tyler Manolovitz, Michelle Martinez, and Linda M. Turney, “Head First into the Patron-Driven Acquisition Pool: A Comparison of Librarian Selections Versus Patron Purchases,” Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship 23, no. 3 (2011): 203. doi:10.1080/1941126X.2011.601224.

^26. Emily K. Chan and Susan L. Kendall, “Identifying Users of Demand-Driven E-Book Programs: Applications for Collection Development,” in Association of College & Research Libraries, ACRL 2013 Proceedings, 302. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/2013/papers/ChanKendell_Identifying.pdf.

^27. Jason Price and John McDonald, “Beguiled by Bananas: A Retrospective Study on the Usage and Breadth of Patron vs. Librarian Acquired E-Book Collections,” paper presented at the 39th Annual Charleston Conference: Issues in Book and Serials Acquisition, 5 November 2009. http://ccdl.libraries.claremont.edu/cdm/singleitem/collection/lea/id/175.

^28. Lynn Sutton, “Collaborating with Our Patrons: Letting the Users Select,” paper presented at the 11th National Conference of the Association for College and Research Libraries, Charlotte, North Carolina, April 10–13, 2003. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/pdf/lsutton.PDF.

^29. David Wells and Petra Dumbell, “Ebook Usage at Curtin University Library: Patterns, Projections and Strategy,” paper presented at a conference of the Victorian Association for Library Automation, 8 February 2010. http://espace.library.curtin.edu.au/R?func=dbin-jump-full&local_base=gen01-era02&object_id=145452.

^30. Rebecca Schroeder, “When Patrons Call the Shots: Patron-Driven Acquisition at Brigham Young University,” Collection Building 31, no. 1 (2012): 14. doi:10.1108/01604951211199128.

^31. Jonathan Bunkell and Sharon Dyas-Correia, “E-Books vs. Print: Which is the Better Value?,” Serials Librarian: From the Printed Page to the Digital Age 56, no. 1–4 (2009): 216. doi:10.1080/03615260802698283.

^32. Doug Way and Julie Garrison, “Financial Implications of Demand-Driven Acquisitions: A Case Study of the Value of Short-Term Loans,” in Patron-Driven Acquisitions: History and Best Practices, edited by David A. Swords (Berlin: De Gruyter Saur, 2011), 140.

^33. Nancy Sprague and Ben Hunter, “Assessing E-Books: Taking a Closer Look at E-Book Statistics,” Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services 32, no. 3–4 (2008): 155–156. doi:10.1080/14649055.2008.10766213.

^34. Geoff Kelly, “A Year of Demand Driven Acquisition of Ebooks at the Open Polytechnic Library,” New Zealand Library & Information Management Journal 52, no. 1 (2010): 41–54.

^35. Tony Davies and Michelle Morgan, “E-Books Down Under,” Proceedings of the 2013 Charleston Library Conference. doi:10.5703/1288284315253.

^36. Susan E. Yager and Zsuzsana Szabo, “Using an E-Book to Teach Technology: Effects on Student Performance,” Proceedings of the 49the SIGMIS annual Conference on Computer Personnel Research, San Antonio, TX, USA, May 19–21, 2011, 9. doi:10.1145/1982143.1982146.

^37. International Publishers Association and Federation of European Publishers, VAT/GST on Books & E-books: An IPA/FEP Global Special Report (2015). http://www.internationalpublishers.org/images/VAT2015.pdf.

^38. European Court of Justice, “France and Luxembourg Cannot Apply a Reduced Rate of VAT to the Supply of Electronic Books, in Contrast With Paper Books: Judgments in Cases C-479/13 and C-502/13, Commission v France and Commission v Luxembourg,” press release 30/2015. http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2015-03/cp150030en.pdf.

^39. Margit Jõgi and Kate-Riin Kont. 2009. “Reader Surveys and Indicators of Library Statistics: Serving Library Performance Evaluation and Improvement of Service Quality, on the Example of the National Library of Estonia,” in Teenuse kvaliteet: raamatukogutöö tulemuslikkuse näitaja = Service Quality: Library Performance Indicators, special issue, Acta Bibliothecae Nationalis Estoniae 12 B, Informatsioon ja ühiskond = Information and Society 1: 167–160.

^40. Kelly, “A Year of Demand Driven,” 3.

^41. Kelly, “A Year of Demand Driven,” 4.

^42. Since EBL has been acquired by ProQuest, this URL now redirects to the e-book section of ProQuest’s website, http://www.proquest.com/products-services/ebooks/ebooks-main.html. Snapshots of EBL’s former website can be found on Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine, for example. https://web.archive.org/web/20120113102520/http://www.eblib.com/—Ed.

^43. “A Year of Demand Driven,” 3; Ebooks Corporation, “EBL Addresses the Needs of Academic and Research Libraries …,” (accessed December 29, 2005).at http://www.eblib.com/?p=about (no longer available), archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20120113102520/http://www.eblib.com/.

^44. Roswitha Poll, Peter te Boekhorst, and Sebastian Mundt, Measuring Quality Performance Measurement in Libraries, 2nd rev. ed. (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2008), 124.

^45. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 11620:2014: Information and documentation—Library Performance Indicators (Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 2014), B.2.1.4.