Perceived programmatic and institutional fit for faculty in public administration, policy, and affairs: An empirical study

ABSTRACT

This study undertakes an evaluation of candidates and their hireability within programmatic and institutional contexts. The focus is on applicant qualifications, characteristics, and perceived fit within the program and institution. A survey of program contacts for graduate programs in public affairs analyzes candidate hireability. Results indicate clear differences between programs with similar ranking and institutional differences from Carnegie Classifications, but with little clarity on the rationale for the differences. Likewise, findings emerge relating to publishing in discipline-specific academic journals and obtaining a doctorate from online institutions. Discussions focus on implications for programs, institutions, and applicants seeking their first appointment in higher education.

KEYWORDS:

• Faculty selection
• public affairs programs
• programmatic fit
• institutional fit

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Adam Williams

Adam Williams is an Associate Professor, Department Chair and MPA Director within the Department of Public Administration at the University of Illinois Springfield. His research focuses on human resources, public procurement, and public affairs education.

Derek R. Slagle

Derek R. Slagle holds a dual appointment in the University of Arkansas at Little Rock School of Public Affairs as an Assistant Professor and Director of the UALR Survey Research Center. Additionally he is an Arkansas Governor appointed Commissioner. His research interests include public affairs pedagogy and institutional characteristics, state government, & higher education administration.