1,005
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Target Article

There’s No Harm in Talking: Re-Establishing the Relationship Between Theological and Secular Bioethics

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 5-13 | Published online: 16 Nov 2020
 

Abstract

Theological and secular voices in bioethics have drifted into separate silos. Such a separation results in part from (1) theologians focusing less on conveying ideas in ways that contribute to a pluralistic and public bioethical discourse and (2) the dwindling receptivity of religious arguments within secular bioethics. This essay works against these drifts by putting forward an argument that does not bounce around a religious echo-chamber, but instead demonstrates how insights of Christian anthropology can be meaningfully responsive to secular bioethics’ rightful concerns with inequality and injustice. We offer core concepts from Christian bioethics that encourage dialogue with secular and theological bioethicists. The theologically-grounded concepts, human dignity, sin, and the common good, provide intellectual resources to address major areas of bioethical concern that remain unresolved.

This article is referred to by:
Response to Open Peer Commentaries for “There’s No Harm in Talking: Reestablishing the Relationship Between Theological and Secular Bioethics”
What’s Missing in Secular Bioethics? The False Dichotomy between “the Secular” and “the Theological”
Methodological Clarity in Religious Perspectives of Bioethical Issues: Lessons from Islamic Studies
Community, Complicity, and Critique: Christian Concepts in Secular Bioethics
The Social Context of Religion in the Jurisdictions of Bioethics
Purely Faith-Based vs. Rationally-Informed Theological Bioethics
Correlating Bioethics and Theology
Talking at Cross Purposes: Why We Shouldn’t Re-Establish the Relationship Between Theological and Secular Bioethics
Talking Can Be Harmful Depending on What You Say
“‘There’s No Harm in Talking’…True…But It Depends on How We Talk and What We Then Do”
Public Reason as the Way for Dialogue
A Data-Driven Argument in Bioethics: Why Theologically Grounded Concepts May Not Provide the Necessary Intellectual Resources to Discuss Inequality and Injustice in Healthcare Contexts
Ethical Analysis and Beyond! How Christian Anthropology and the Concept of Dignity Can Also Address Moral Distress in End-of-Life Care
Vulnerable Life: Reflections on the Relationship Between Theological and Philosophical Ethics
The Devil in the Details
Pluralism in the Jewish Ethical Tradition

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 137.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.