Supported Decision Making with People at the Margins of Autonomy: Response to Commentaries

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size

This article refers to:

Supported Decision Making: A Concept at the Margins vs. Center of Autonomy?

The Doctrine of Informed Consent Doesn’t Need Modification for Supported Decision Making

Integrating Supported Decision-Making into the Clinical Research Process

Supported Decision-Making for People with Dementia Should Focus on Their Values

Healthcare Decisions Are Always Supported Decisions

Realizing Supported Decision-Making: What It Does—and Does Not—Require

Supported Decision Making With People at the Margins of Autonomy

Supported Decisions as the Patient’s Own?

DISCLAIMER

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 Francis also questions our reference to Bigby et al. (2019). The article we refer to in our Target Article—incidentally, also Bigby et al. (2019)—is a review citing the primary study identifying “life visions” as a feature of supported decision making.

Additional information

Funding

AP is supported by the Greenwall Foundation Faculty Scholars Program. JK is supported by NIA P30-AG010124. EAL is supported by NIA K01-AG064123, the Greenwall Foundation Faculty Scholars Program, and the Emmanuel and Robert Hart Chair in Bioethics. This work is made possible in part by the Healthy Brain Research Network (HBRN) funded by the CDC?s Alzheimer?s Disease and Healthy Aging Program U48 DP005053.