38
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Open Peer Commentaries

Personal but Necessarily Predictive? Developing a Bioethics Research Agenda for AI-Enabled Decision-Making Tools

ORCID Icon
Pages 29-31 | Published online: 24 Jun 2024
 
This article refers to:
A Personalized Patient Preference Predictor for Substituted Judgments in Healthcare: Technically Feasible and Ethically Desirable

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I wish to sincerely thank Robert Truog and Martha Montello for their formative feedback on the ideas reflected in this commentary, and to the Brocher Foundation for providing the collaborative space to further develop the concepts herein.

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s.)

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by a Mentored Research Scientist Award from the National Human Genome Research Institute (K01HG013112) and Fondation Brocher

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 137.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.