Assessment of Environmental Background Gamma Radiation Variation in Minna Area of Nigeria

Abstract

Radiation has been acknowledged to be responsible for deleterious conditions in living tissues. Hence, environmental background gamma radiation (BGR) measurement is crucial from an environmental and health perspective. In this study, due to the absence of comprehensive background gamma radiation data and the increasing numbers of anthropogenic activities that could increase the BGR level, such as where mining activities are active. The BGR in the Minna area of Niger State, Nigeria, was measured and analyzed in this study. In-situ measurement of the background gamma radiation level was carried out using a well-calibrated portable handheld GQ GMC-500 Plus nuclear radiation detector at an elevation of about 1.0 m above ground level. A global positioning system from Garmin (GPSmap 78s) was adopted for identifying geographical locations. A total of 1172 points were surveyed across the study area for background environmental radiation. The BGR values ranged from 0.102 to 0.147 μSv/h, with an overall mean value of 0.126 μSv/h. The average measured dose rate was more than twice the reported world average value of 0.059 μSv/h. The annual effective dose equivalent (AEDE) for the research area was calculated to be 0.221 mSv/y on average. The mean AEDE is lower than the ICRP recommended limit. This shows that the population of the Minna area is radiologically safe based on the estimated AEDE value. Similarly, the excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR) value ranged from 0.626 × 10⁻³ to 0.901 × 10⁻³ mSv/y with a mean value of 0.774 ± 0.09 × 10⁻³ mSv/y. The mean value of AEDE is below the 0.24 mSv/y permissible limits as recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). The mean ELCR value exceeds the average world value of 0.29 × 10⁻³. Also, the mean organ dose values estimated for the whole body, liver, kidney, testes, bone marrow, ovaries, and lungs are 0.150 ± 0.02, 0.102 ± 0.01, 0.137 ± 0.02, 0.181 ± 0.02, 0.152 ± 0.02, 0.128 ± 0.02 and 0.141 ± 0.02 mSv/y respectively. The differences in the calculated mean of BGR were attributed to natural and human factors. Geological variation is a fundamental factor that influences the changes in BGR. Human activities, mining, building materials, and the use of phosphate fertilizers in agricultural practices are responsible for the differences in BGR. The ELCR implies that terrestrial gamma radiation does not pose any immediate radiological health effects on residents of the area, but there is a tendency for long-term health hazards in the future, such as cancer, due to the dose accumulated.

Keywords:

• Background gamma-radiation
• radiological safety
• gamma-rays
• cancer risk

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).