116
Views
34
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A Dose-Response Study of the Effects of Prenatal and Lactational Exposure to TCDD on the Immune Response to Influenza A Virus

, &
Pages 445-463 | Received 13 Jan 2005, Accepted 13 Apr 2005, Published online: 24 Feb 2007
 

Abstract

The goal of the current study was to evaluate the immune response to a common respiratory pathogen, influenza A virus, in mice exposed to increasing doses of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) during development. Additionally, the treatment paradigm was designed to provide exposure throughout fetal and neonatal development, beginning on d 1 of gestation. To accomplish this, impregnated C57Bl/6 mice were treated with 0.25 μg/kg TCDD on d 0 and 7 of pregnancy, followed by 2 additional doses of 0.25, 1, or 5 μg/kg given on d 14 and postpartum d 2. The adult offspring were infected with influenza virus, and components of the adaptive and innate immune responses were evaluated. Our results show that developmental exposure to TCDD dose-responsively suppressed both the cell-mediated and antibody responses to influenza virus in female but not males. In contrast, TCDD exposure enhanced the innate immune responses in offspring of both sexes; specifically, neutrophilia and interferon (IFN) γ levels in the lung were increased. These alterations in functional immunity did not result from overt toxicity to the immune organs, as developmental TCDD exposure did not alter the cellular composition of the thymus, spleen, or bone marrow. These findings extend our knowledge of the dose-responsive nature of immunological defects induced by developmental exposure to TCDD and offer insight regarding the dose required to alter the immune response to viral infection. Moreover, we demonstrate a clear dose at which no observable effects on immune function later in life were detected.

This research was supported by research grant 6-FY01-41 from the March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, and by a grant from the National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health (ES10619). The authors thank Sabine Teske, Haley Neff-LaFord, Julie Lopez, and Nicole Harrison for technical assistance.

Notes

This research was supported by research grant 6-FY01-41 from the March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, and by a grant from the National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health (ES10619). The authors thank Sabine Teske, Haley Neff-LaFord, Julie Lopez, and Nicole Harrison for technical assistance.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 482.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.