Exposure Assessment and Risk of Gastrointestinal Illness Among Surfers

Abstract

Surfing is a unique recreational activity with the possibility of elevated risk for contracting gastrointestinal (GI) illness through ingestion of contaminated water. No prior studies have assessed exposure from ingestion among surfing populations. This study estimated the magnitude and frequency of incidental water ingestion using a Web-based survey and integrated exposure distributions with enterococci distributions to predict the probability of GI illness at six Oregon beaches. The mean exposure magnitude and frequency were 170 ml of water ingested per day and 77 days spent surfing per year, respectively. The mean number of enterococci ingested ranged from approximately 11 to 86 colony-forming units (CFU) per day. Exposure-response analyses were conducted using an ingested dose model and two epidemiological models. Risk was characterized using joint probability curves (JPC). At the most contaminated beach, the annualized ingested dose model estimated a mean 9% probability of a 50% probability of GI illness, similar to the results of the first epidemiological model (mean 6% probability of a 50% probability of GI illness). The second epidemiological model predicted a 23% probability of exceeding an exposure equivalent to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) maximum acceptable GI illness rate (19 cases/1000 swimmers). While the annual risk of GI illness for Oregon surfers is not high, data showed that surfers ingest more water compared to swimmers and divers and need to be considered in regulatory and public health efforts, especially in more contaminated waters. Our approach to characterize risk among surfers is novel and informative to officials responsible for advisory programs. It also highlights the need for further research on microbial dose-response relationships to meet the needs of quantitative microbial risk assessments (QMRA).

Support for the study was provided by Oregon Sea Grant NA-06OAR4170010. All views or opinions expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality policy or guidance, or those of any other public or private entity. No official endorsement is implied or is to be inferred. The authors acknowledge Jennifer Ketterman, with the Oregon Beach Monitoring Program; Catherine Neumann; Pete Stauffer with Oregon Surfrider and Kim Rueter with Oregon Surf; Marcus Mead; and Lydia Newton and Virginia Lesser of the OSU Survey Research Center.