411
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

In vitro exposure to the next-generation plasticizer diisononyl cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate (DINCH): cytotoxicity and genotoxicity assessment in human cells

, &
Pages 526-536 | Published online: 26 Jun 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Plasticizers are currently present in many consumer products, particularly food packaging, children’s toys, and medical devices. There are concerns regarding potential leaching to environment or food, thus increasing the risk of human exposure by inhalation, ingestion and/or dermal absorption potentially leading to adverse health consequences. Hexamoll diisononyl cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate (Hexamoll® DINCH®), a non-phthalate plasticizer, has been used as a safer alternative to hazardous phthalates. In contrast to phthalates, evidence indicates that DINCH did not produce endocrine disruption, reproductive dysfunctions, genotoxicity or mutagenicity. However, there are limited data available regarding safety assessment, especially with respect to genotoxicity in human cells. The aim of this study was to assess DINCH cytotoxic and genotoxic effects in human liver and kidney cell lines following several exposure periods. For this purpose, the MTT cell viability, micronucleus, conventional and formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (FPG)-modified comet assays were employed to detect cell death and genotoxicity, respectively. Data demonstrated that DINCH induced cytotoxicity in kidney cells exposed for 48hr, but not in liver cells. No marked chromosomal damage was noted after short-term or longer following treatment of both cell lines. However, DINCH produced oxidative DNA damage in liver cells exposed for 3 h, which decreased after a more prolonged incubation period. The occurrence of oxidative lesions, even transiently, indicates that mutation fixation may occur leading to adverse effects in liver. Therefore, these findings suggest that DINCH may be hazardous to humans and that further investigation is necessary to warrant its safety.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank to the team from the Genetic Toxicology Laboratory (INSA, Portugal) who helped in this work. This work was partially financed by national funds through the FCT - Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P., under the project PTDC/SAU-PUB/29481/2017 and by UID/BIM/00009/2013.

Additional information

Funding

This work was partially financed by national funds through the FCT - Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P., under the project PTDC/SAU-PUB/29481/2017 and by UID/BIM/00009/2013.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 482.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.