Effects of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) gene polymorphisms on the association between smoking and lung function among workers in swine operations

ABSTRACT

Workers in swine operations may be at increased risk of developing respiratory problems. These respiratory conditions are more prevalent among workers who are smokers. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) genes play an important role in human immune responses to various respiratory hazards. This study aimed to investigate whether polymorphisms in TNF genes might alter the effects of smoking on lung function among workers in swine operations. Three hundred and seventy-four full-time workers from large swine operations and 411 non-farming rural dwellers in Saskatchewan were included in this study. Information on demographic and lifestyle characteristics, pulmonary function, and blood samples were obtained. Multiple linear regression analyses were used in the statistical analysis. Three promoter polymorphisms (rs1799724, rs361525, and rs1800629) in the TNF gene were investigated. Only the interaction term between smoking status and rs1799724 was significant in the multiple regression models. Among workers with the rs1799724 polymorphism (TT+TC), current smokers exhibited significantly lower lung function than nonsmokers. These associations were not observed among workers with the wild-type (CC). These findings were not observed among non-farming rural dwellers. Data demonstrated the possible involvement of TNF gene in (1) development of adverse respiratory conditions among workers who are smokers, (2) importance of smoking cessation among workers, especially those with polymorphisms in the TNF gene, and (3) potential implications in treatment, screening, and prevention.

KEYWORDS:

• Lung functions
• occupational exposure
• smoking
• TNF gene
• workers in swine operations

Data availability

The data that has been used for this study is confidential and would not be shared.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interests.

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Biomedical Research Ethics Board of the University of Saskatchewan. Informed written consent was obtained from all subjects.

Additional information

Funding

The study was supported by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (grant MOP-57907).