213
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Effects of life-stage and passive tobacco smoke exposure on pulmonary innate immunity and influenza infection in mice

, , ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 439-456 | Published online: 09 Feb 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Limited data are available on the effects of perinatal environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure for early childhood influenza infection. The aim of the present study was to examine whether perinatal versus adult ETS exposure might provoke more severe systemic and pulmonary innate immune responses in mice inoculated with influenza A/Puerto Rico/8/34 virus (IAV) compared to phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). BALB/c mice were exposed to filtered air (FA) or ETS for 6 weeks during the perinatal or adult period of life. Immediately following the final exposure, mice were intranasally inoculated with IAV or PBS. Significant inflammatory effects were observed in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of neonates inoculated with IAV (FA+IAV or ETS+IAV) compared to PBS (ETS+PBS or FA+PBS), and in the lung parenchyma of neonates administered ETS+IAV versus FA+IAV. Type I and III interferons were also elevated in the spleens of neonates, but not adults with ETS+IAV versus FA+IAV exposure. Both IAV-inoculated neonate groups exhibited significantly more CD4 T cells and increasing numbers of CD8 and CD25 T cells in lungs relative to their adult counterparts. Taken together, these results suggest perinatal ETS exposure induces an exaggerated innate immune response, which may overwhelm protective anti-inflammatory defenses against IAV, and enhances severity of infection at early life stages (e.g., in infants and young children).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Alexa K. Pham, Jocelyn A. Claude, and Dale L. Uyeminami for technical laboratory assistance during the course of this study, and Dr. Rona M. Silva for help with editing.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health grant <#AWARD-ID;>CDC/NIOSH U54 OH07550</#AWARD-ID;> and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences <#AWARD-ID;>P30 ES023513,P51 OD011107</#AWARD-ID;> (NIEHS) grants P30 ES023513, and P51 OD011107.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 482.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.