![Sample our Behavioral Sciences journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110801/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Behavioral-Sciences.jpg"})
Abstract
Individuals' selves are malleable in romantic relationships. Specifically, individuals integrate characteristics of partners into their self-concepts to further closeness/intimacy goals (Aron, Citation2003). Unfortunately, this malleability during relationships predicts self-concept change/confusion if a relationship ends (Slotter, Gardner, & Finkel, Citation2010). The current research investigated one potential moderator of these effects: attachment anxiety. Individuals who experience elevated attachment anxiety desire greater closeness/intimacy in their relationships than their less anxious counterparts. Thus, their self-concepts may be especially malleable in romantic relationships. Testing these hypotheses, three studies using undergraduate samples demonstrated that elevated attachment anxiety predicted individuals' selves being more malleable during romantic relationships (Studies 1 & 2) and being more susceptible to change/confusion should the relationship end (Studies 3A & 3B).
Notes
We first examined participants' pre-testing session rating of how characteristic the idiosyncratic not me attribute was of their self-concept and found no differences across context, F(2, 68) = 0.08, p = .78, attachment prime, F(2, 68) = 0.02, p = .88, or their interaction term, F(2, 68) = 0.02, p = .89.
Participants' ratings of the idiosyncratic not me attribute at the pre-testing session did not predict their ratings of the same attribute after viewing the target's profiles, F(3, 67) = 1.56, p = .22.