![Sample our Behavioral Sciences journals, sign in here to start your access, latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/110801/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Behavioral-Sciences.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
Although rates vary, approximately 38.4% of women and 3.9% of men report experiencing military sexual trauma (MST). MST is associated with numerous psychosocial consequences, increased propensity for physical and mental health diagnoses, suicide, and an elevated likelihood of revictimization. Consequently, medical and mental health care for MST-related health sequelae is often warranted for individuals who have experienced MST; however, many MST survivors forgo or delay MST-related care, despite the fact that the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) provides free healthcare for MST-related health conditions. One potential explanation for this phenomenon is that survivors of MST feel betrayed by the military institution that they served when the MST occurred due to the institutional response to MST or perceptions that the institution failed to prevent MST from occurring. Perceptions of institutional betrayal may, in turn, decrease survivors’ likelihood of disclosing MST and utilizing necessary treatment through VHA or affiliated institutions. A theoretical model of the role of institutional betrayal on help-seeking is proposed in which institutional betrayal serves as a potential barrier to utilizing MST-related healthcare. Potential mediators of this association (e.g., distrust, beliefs about safety) are also posited. This model offers utility in conceptualizing institutional factors that may influence helping-seeking following MST. By testing and refining such models, institutions and providers may be better-equipped to support MST survivors in obtaining necessary healthcare.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Nazanin Bahraini for her contributions to initial discussions and conceptualization of some of the ideas proposed in this manuscript. This material is based upon work supported in part by the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Rocky Mountain MIRECC. For Dr. Holliday, this work was supported in part by the Office of Academic Affiliations, Advanced Fellowship Program in Mental Illness Research and Treatment, Department of Veterans Affairs. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.