121
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Analysis of Worldwide Naphthalene Surface Soil Regulatory Guidance Values

Pages 451-497 | Published online: 21 May 2012
 

Abstract

Many environmental regulatory jurisdictions worldwide specify the maximum soil contamination mass burdens that may occur without prompting a regulatory response. For residential surface soils, these regulatory guidance values (RGVs) are generally based on human (often child) health risks from inhalation, ingestion, and dermal exposure to contamination. RGVs have been promulgated for more than 1,200 soil contaminants. Of these, naphthalene is the most frequently regulated contaminant. The 234 known naphthalene RGVs range from a minimum of 0.0289 mg/kg to a maximum of 16,000 mg/kg and span 5.7 orders of magnitude. Analysis illustrates that, although there are small non-random clusters of values, and there may be statistically significant differences between the values used in the U.S. and elsewhere around the world, the overall distribution of numbers strongly resembles (r = 0.9953) that of a log-normal random variable. Results of Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis applied to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency risk model are presented to approximate the range of the naphthalene RGV span that can be attributed to uncertainty in cancer or non-cancer risk formulations. Uncertainty in the cancer risk formulation could account for approximately 41% of the RGVs. Uncertainty in the non-cancer risk formulation could account for a different 22% of the RGVs, but the cancer risk model generally yields the binding (lowest) value. The implications of these widely variable RGVs for health risk and remediation costs are discussed and methods of reducing variability are suggested.

Acknowledgment

The author gratefully acknowledges the efforts of a group of scholars who have been instrumental in identify environmental jurisdictions worldwide that have promulgated RGVs, and developing methods by which these values can be recorded, tabulated, and analyzed. The author particularly acknowledges the contributions of Dr. Jun Ma, Elijah Petersen, Amy Hanna, Paul Manglona, Mikkail Miller, Maurice Gayle, and Emily Kowalsky. Elements of this work were conducted with the support of National Science Foundation grant CMS CBET-0650675 and U.S. Dept. of Transportation grant DTRT06-0037.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 523.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.