72
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

The epidemiology of substance use in the West Bank: Who is at risk?

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Published online: 27 Apr 2023
 

Abstract

Illicit drug use is bound by a religious, social, and cultural stigma in Palestine. The extent of illicit drug use in Palestine is difficult to estimate due to the limited availability of research and challenged by poor measurement and inconsistent reporting. Concern about the hidden nature of drug use continues to be reported. We investigated the prevalence and risk factors associated with illicit drug use in the north of the West Bank. We compared the results between refugee camps and rural and urban areas. The recruited males (N = 1045) were invited to fill out a self-administrated questionnaire and to give urine samples in 2022. Multi-line drug screen test in urine was used as a screening tool to evaluate the presence of 12-drugs in urine samples. The respondents (N = 656) were aged 15-58 years. At least one drug was detected positive in 19.1% of the participants’ urine samples, with the highest percentages among refugees (25.9%), followed by rural (13.6%) and urban participants (10.9%) (P-value < 0.001). Moreover, around half of the drug users were multidrug users. Refugees were 3.8 times (P-value = 0.002), and urban were 2.3 times (P-value = 0.033) more likely to be drug users than rural participants. Besides the geographical factors, socio-demographic factors like age (<30 years), marital status (single), drinking alcohol, and vape-smoking played significant roles in the increasing risk of illicit drug use in the West Bank. The findings from this study draw attention to our limited understanding of the epidemiology of substance use among Palestinians.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all study participants for their time and efforts.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. All authors agreed to submit the manuscript to the Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of An- Najah University’s Institutional Research Ethics Board, approval reference number (Ref:Med Oct.2022/10) and with the 2013 Helsinki Declaration

Authors’ contributions

BD contributed to conceptualization, resources, methodology, formal analysis, and original draft preparation. MD contributed to data curation and original draft preparation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Data availability statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 499.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.