In this article, the authors explore evaluation between a local mental health agency and a researcher from the local university with a focus on issues for ongoing inquiry in the unique clubhouse setting and special attention to maximizing member participation and comfort throughout the process. Due to grantor expectations and a growing culture of systematic evaluation of psychosocial rehabilitation, establishing and implementing outcome indicator protocols is important for the modern clubhouse. The authors and club members collaborated on developing a new outcome indicator protocol. After completing the process, information was gathered from members and the research team about their comfort level throughout the process. The university and the clubhouse can be effective evaluation partners; however, attention to important issues in clubhouse research must be a priority. Several important issues and tips for clubhouses considering program evaluation are included.
Academia and Mental Health Practice Evaluation Partnerships: Focus on the Clubhouse Model
Log in via your institution
Log in to Taylor & Francis Online
Restore content access
Restore content access for purchases made as guestPDF download + Online access
- 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
- Article PDF can be downloaded
- Article PDF can be printed
Issue Purchase
- 30 days online access to complete issue
- Article PDFs can be downloaded
- Article PDFs can be printed
Related Research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.