1,930
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Eating and Weight Concerns

Body Dissatisfaction and Its Correlates in 5- to 7-Year-Old Girls: A Social Learning Experiment

ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 757-769 | Published online: 02 Jun 2016
 

Abstract

There is limited research on cognitive risk factors for eating disorders among young girls despite accumulating evidence that body dissatisfaction and thin-ideal internalization can begin to occur between 3 and 5 years of age. To improve upon the existing literature and significantly contribute to the prevention and intervention literature, the current study examined body dissatisfaction, thin-ideal internalization, and self-objectification in girls between 5 and 7 years of age. The sample consisted of 151 mother–daughter dyads with 63 five-year-olds, 39 six-year-olds, and 49 seven-year-olds. Girls were interviewed about their body dissatisfaction, thin-ideal, and self-objectification. In addition, all mothers and daughters participated in an individual and joint mirror experiment. Levels of body dissatisfaction were consistent across 5- to 7-year-olds. Thin-ideal internalization was higher among 5-year-olds than 6- and 7-year-olds. In contrast, self-objectification was higher among 6- and 7-year-olds than 5-year-old girls. Mother’s body dissatisfaction significantly and positively predicted daughter’s body dissatisfaction during the joint mirror experiment. Similarly, mother’s body satisfaction significantly and positively predicted daughter’s body satisfaction. Results from this study suggest that girls model their mothers’ self-body talk. In addition, girls will change their positive or negative body responses after being exposed to their mothers’ response.

View correction statement:
Corrigendum

FUNDING

This research was supported by a Mental Health Research Grant, JRG-168, awarded to Marisol Perez by the Hogg Foundation for Mental Health.

Notes

1 The analyses and significance were the same even when controlling for daughter’s BMI.

2 Due to partitioned variance, multilevel analyses do not result in the same conventional R2 values that result from ordinary least squares regression. We computed pseudo-R2 values that quantify the proportion of Level 1 residual variance reduced by including predictors (Snijders & Bosker, Citation2012).

Additional information

Funding

This research was supported by a Mental Health Research Grant, JRG-168, awarded to Marisol Perez by the Hogg Foundation for Mental Health.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 350.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.